Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T
Right arrow Articles by Shimada, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T
Right arrow Articles by Shimada, Y

Chest, Vol 100, 112-117, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Determination of the optimal pressure support level evaluated by measuring transdiaphragmatic pressure

T Kimura, J Takezawa, K Nishiwaki and Y Shimada
ICU, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan.

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimum pressure support (PS) in six patients with respiratory failure. Esophageal pressure (Pe), gastric pressure (Pg), airway pressure, and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), obtained by subtracting Pe from Pg, were measured using a newly developed multiluminal nasogastric catheter. For each patient, different PS levels were selected every 20 minutes, and measurements were made at each PS level. We defined the optimum PS level as the level that showed the minimum Pe value. Respiratory rate (RR) decreased and tidal volume (VT) increased with an increase in PS level. RR and VT at the optimum PS were 19.7 +/- 5.5 breaths per minute and 11.7 +/- 4.5 ml/kg, respectively. Pdi decreased linearly with increasing PS level in all patients. Mean Pdi at the optimum Ps was 4.2 +/- 1.2 cm H2O. Based on the relationship between Pdi and PS level, we constructed an equation to estimate the optimum PS level as follows: Optimum PS level = [( Pdi during T-piece mode] - 4)/0.8. We conclude that Pdi measurement is helpful for titrating the required PS level.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. Sinderby
Ventilatory Assist Driven by Patient Demand
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 729 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 518 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. BECK, S. B. GOTTFRIED, P. NAVALESI, Y. SKROBIK, N. COMTOIS, M. ROSSINI, and C. SINDERBY
Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm during Pressure Support Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2001; 164(3): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
M. Vitacca, S. Nava, M. Confalonieri, L. Bianchi, R. Porta, E. Clini, and N. Ambrosino
The Appropriate Setting of Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in Stable COPD Patients
Chest, November 1, 2000; 118(5): 1286 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. GIANNOULI, K. WEBSTER, D. ROBERTS, and M. YOUNES
Response of Ventilator-dependent Patients to Different Levels of Pressure Support and Proportional Assist
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 1999; 159(6): 1716 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 ChestHome page
M. Barnard, A. Shukla, T. Lovell, and J. Goldstone
Esophageal-Directed Pressure Support Ventilation in Normal Volunteers
Chest, February 1, 1999; 115(2): 482 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.