Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerny, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerny, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, R.

Chest, Vol 100, 143-146, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Evaluation of the Velcom-100 pulse Doppler cardiac output computer

JC Cerny, M Ketslakh, CL Poulos, RE Dechert and RH Bartlett
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

The use of Doppler ultrasound as a means of obtaining cardiac output (CO) measurements quickly, easily, and noninvasively has been made possible by recent technologic developments. We evaluated a new pulse Doppler ultrasonic unit (Velcom-100, Waters Instruments, Inc) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at the University of Michigan Medical Center. Accuracy of this device was determined by comparison of CO results obtained from the Velcom-100 (COV) against those of conventional thermal dilution cardiac output (COT) measurements. Twenty- six postoperative patients were used for this study, ranging in age from 20 to 82 years old. Initial studies prior to in vivo standardization demonstrated a significantly lower result (p = 0.039) for the Velcom-100 with a mean difference of 0.86 L/min (COT-COV). This comparison was significantly improved in subsequent studies following in vivo standardization (COT-COV = 0.02 L/min, p = 0.646). Linear regression analysis showed a significant, positive correlation between the two results (r = 0.82, p less than 0.05) indicating an excellent trending capability for the Velcom-100. Our evaluation found the Velcom- 100 to be user friendly, allowing rapid training of ICU technicians and applicability for postoperative monitoring.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.