Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, D
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, D
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, R.

Chest, Vol 100, 1076-1081, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

High-volume, low-pressure cuffs. Are they always low pressure?

D Guyton, MJ Banner and RR Kirby
University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.

Ischemic tracheal complications due to the ETT cuff occur in approximately 10 percent of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients despite the use of high-volume, low-pressure ETT cuffs. Using a laboratory model, we studied the effects of airway pressure on three different ETT cuff designs, including two "low pressure" designs. Positive airway pressure acted on the "low pressure" cuffs to create a "self-sealing" effect that maintained tracheal occlusion despite airway pressures that exceeded cuff inflation pressure. Increases in airway pressure caused by decreased lung compliance resulted in higher cuff inflation pressures in all three groups, with the smallest increase occurring in the design that had the longest tracheal contact length. We conclude that the current high-volume, low-pressure ETT cuff design currently used does not guarantee low cuff pressure when high airway pressures occur, and an alternative design should be developed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
J E Heffner
Management of the chronically ventilated patient with a tracheostomy
Chronic Respiratory Disease, July 1, 2005; 2(3): 151 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.