Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forastiere, F
Right arrow Articles by Perucci, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forastiere, F
Right arrow Articles by Perucci, C.

Chest, Vol 100, 927-934, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Indices of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in a pediatric population

F Forastiere, R Pistelli, P Michelozzi, GM Corbo, N Agabiti, R Bertollini, G Ciappi and CA Perucci
Epidemiologic Unit, Latium Regional Health Authority, Rome, Italy.

A cross-sectional survey of the prevalence of asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity among schoolchildren (7 to 11 years old) was carried out in three areas of the Latium region (Central Italy). Out of 1,777 children tested with methacholine challenge (MCT), 15.1 percent had a 20 percent fall in FEV1 after a provocative concentration (PC20FEV1) of 4 mg/ml of methacholine or less; 69.7 percent had a PC20FEV1 less than 64.0 mg/ml, whereas 50.3 percent were nonresponders. Two continuous measures of bronchial responsiveness, the slope (percentage of change in FEV1 per mg/ml of methacholine) and the area under the dose response curve, were calculated in order to avoid the loss of information in nonresponders. Applying a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the three estimators did not show any statistically significant difference in their overall performance in detecting asthma (ROC areas: PC20FEV1 = 0.683, slope = 0.681, area = 0.702 or asthma- like symptoms. The log transformation of slope, having a unimodal and slightly skewed shape, is an appealing continuous measure of bronchial responsiveness useful for epidemiologic studies. The final choice of an appropriate estimator of the concentration-response curve to methacholine, however, depends upon both the statistical tests or the modelling procedures to be used and clarification of the prognostic value of different indices of bronchial responsiveness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
G. de Meer, G. B. Marks, J. C. de Jongste, and B. Brunekreef
Airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline: dose-response slope or PD15?
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
D. Gautrin, J.-G. Lapierre, J.-L. Malo, and C. Infante-Rivard
Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Symptoms of Asthma in a Six-Year Follow-up Study of Childhood Asthma*
Chest, December 1, 1999; 116(6): 1659 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.