Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Morra, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Morra, L

Chest, Vol 100, 1219-1223, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Urine pentamidine as an indicator of lung pentamidine in patients receiving aerosol therapy

GC Smaldone, C Vinciguerra and L Morra
Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794- 8172.

To determine if urine pentamidine was reflective of lung pentamidine, we compared levels of the drug in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and simultaneously obtained urine. Thirty-one patients who were receiving aerosolized pentamidine either as treatment or as prophylaxis underwent BAL and submitted urine samples for pentamidine analysis. Pentamidine was analyzed in both phases of BAL fluid (supernatant and cell pellet) and in urine using high performance liquid chromatography. Urine results were normalized for creatinine. Patients were categorized as prophylaxis failures (active Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on prophylaxis), electives (free from PCP on prophylaxis), treatment (daily AP in treatment doses for active PCP, or miscellaneous (single dose of AP). Levels in BAL fluid and urine varied widely over several orders of magnitude. However, for all patients, we found a highly significant relationship between BAL supernatant and urine (r = 0.97, p less than 0.0001). No statistical differences were found when comparing levels of pentamidine between failures and electives; however, the number of failures was small. We conclude that urine pentamidine is related to lung pentamidine and can be used as a clinical indicator in patients receiving aerosolized therapy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.