Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haeusslein, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Massie, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haeusslein, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Massie, B. M.

Chest, Vol 100, 1312-1315, Copyright © 1991 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Does the magnitude of mitral regurgitation determine hemodynamic response to vasodilation in chronic congestive heart failure?

EA Haeusslein, BH Greenberg and BM Massie
Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco.

Although it is usually assumed that direct-acting vasodilators improve cardiac function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) by altering left ventricular preload and afterload, several studies have suggested that most of the benefit occurs as a result of a reduction in associated mitral regurgitation (MR), which is present in the majority of patients with severe CHF. To test his hypothesis, the hemodynamic response to oral hydralazine was examined in CHF patients with competent mitral prostheses (group 1) and patients with CHF due to severe MR and left ventricular dysfunction (group 2). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in cardiac, stroke volume, and stroke work indices, although these were greater in group 2. Only group 2 experienced a significant reduction in left ventricular filling pressure. Thus, the presence of MR is not essential for hemodynamic improvement but is associated with significantly greater responses.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American College of Chest Physicians.