Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hendeles, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hendeles, L.

Chest, Vol 101, 309-315, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Relative amount of albuterol delivered to lung receptors from a metered- dose inhaler and nebulizer solution. Bioassay by histamine bronchoprovocation

KV Blake, M Hoppe, E Harman and L Hendeles
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.

The results of previous studies comparing bronchodilatation from beta agonists administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and nebulizer solution have been conflicting. We therefore evaluated a range of albuterol doses administered by these two methods, using histamine bronchoprovocation as a bioassay for the amount of drug reaching the beta 2 receptors in the lung. Twelve stable asthmatic volunteers received, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design on different days, placebo or one, two, four, or six puffs from an MDI attached to an InspirEase device (90 micrograms per puff) or 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, or 5.0 mg of solution delivered in 2 ml of buffered saline through a Hudson Updraft II nebulizer. The histamine concentration required to decrease FEV1 by 20 percent (PC20) was measured 1 h before and 30 min after administration of each treatment and expressed as the increase in PC20 from baseline. The dose-response curves for change in PC20 indicated that the higher doses of the nebulizer solution delivered more drug to beta 2 receptors in the lung than the lower doses from the MDI. For example, the geometric mean increase in PC20 was 1.1 +/- 1.6 (SD) after placebo, 7.5 +/- 2.7 after two puffs from the MDI, and 20.0 +/- 2.1 after 2.5 mg of nebulizer solution (p less than 0.05). Using this bioassay method and administration technique, we estimated that ten puffs from the MDI (0.9 mg) would deliver approximately the same amount of albuterol to lung receptors as 2.5 mg of the nebulizer solution. Taking into account previously published reports and the results of the present study, we conclude that differences in dose, administration technique, nebulizer system efficiency, and severity of airway obstruction can alter the amount of drug reaching the beta 2 receptors in the lungs and, thus, the clinical response.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
R Boyd and P Stuart
Pressurised metered dose inhalers with spacers versus nebulisers for {beta}-agonist delivery in acute asthma in children in the emergency department
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 641 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
L. Hendeles, R. C. Hatton, T. J. Coons, and L. Carlson
Automatic replacement of albuterol nebulizer therapy by metered-dose inhaler and valved holding chamber
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2005; 62(10): 1053 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. B. Dolovich, R. C. Ahrens, D. R. Hess, P. Anderson, R. Dhand, J. L. Rau, G. C. Smaldone, and G. Guyatt
Device Selection and Outcomes of Aerosol Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 335 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M.T. Newhouse, P. Patel, and M. Parry-Billings
Protection against methacholine-induced bronchospasm: salbutamol pMDI versus Clickhaler(R) DPI
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2003; 21(5): 816 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. A. Stewart, R. C. Ahrens, S. Carrier, M. Frosolono, C. Lux, S.-H. Han, and G. Milavetz
Demonstration of In Vivo Bioequivalence of a Generic Albuterol Metered-Dose Inhaler to Ventolin
Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 714 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A L Dewar, A Stewart, J J Cogswell, and G J Connett
A randomised controlled trial to assess the relative benefits of large volume spacers and nebulisers to treat acute asthma in hospital
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 1999; 80(5): 421 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Marshik, S. Moghaddam, I. Tebbett, and L. Hendeles
Degradation of Histamine Solutions Used for Bronchoprovocation
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 194 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.