Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haire, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haire, W. D.
(Chest. 1992;101:91S-97S.)
© 1992 American College of Chest Physicians

Pharmacology of Fibrinolysis

William D. Haire M.D.1

1 The Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.

Fibrinolysis can be achieved pharmacologically with the use of any of the four commercially available plasminogen activators—SK, APSAC, UK, and t-PA. Fibrinolysis with all of these agents is due to their ability to convert plasminogen to plasmin, either in the circulation or on the surface of the thrombus. Each of these plasminogen activators has a slightly different mechanism of action. Despite these mechanistic differences, none of the agents available today is completely "fibrin-specific." Their clinical use is associated with systemic activation of the fibrinolytic mechanism and, consequently, a risk of pathologic bleeding. At clinically applicable doses, all agents are capable of initiating dissolution of thrombi. The rate and extent of thrombus dissolution and fibrinogen degradation vary in different clinical situations, with differing drug doses and routes of administration, and between different drugs. At this time, no one agent has emerged as a superior fibrinolytic agent for all clinical circumstances. [SEE THE FIG10 IN SOURCE PDF] The best drug for treatment of each of the many thrombosis-related disorders must be determined by extensive comparative clinical trials. Given that there are 4 commercially available drugs (without considering the drugs currently in developmental stages) that have not been evaluated extensively at varying doses and dosing intervals, in different combinations, and by various routes and methods of administration in a wide variety of venous and arterial thromboembolic disorders, it is reasonable to conclude that such trials are only in their infancy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.