|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
Chest, Vol 101, 1298-1301, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians
ARTICLES |
HL Israel, JE Gottlieb and WC Maddrey
Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia.
The preventive use of isoniazid (INH) has been controversial since 1975, but official agencies continue to advocate the procedure. Cost- effectiveness and risk benefit studies of preventive INH use have come to conflicting conclusions. A review of eight such studies indicates an increasing tendency to minimize INH hepatotoxicity and to disregard the declining tuberculosis morbidity and mortality in countries in which INH prophylaxis has not been widely adopted. We report three cases of fatal INH-associated hepatitis that illustrate that this complication of preventive INH use remains a serious problem. Current recommendations that encourage wide use of preventive INH therapy are unwise because they inflict a risk of fatal hepatitis on compliant adults and older children who have little danger of tuberculosis while being difficult to deliver to the alcohol- and drug-addicted persons whose risk is high. Health departments and physicians should severely restrict preventive INH therapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Nolan, S. V. Goldberg, and S. E. Buskin Hepatotoxicity Associated With Isoniazid Preventive Therapy: A 7-Year Survey From a Public Health Tuberculosis Clinic JAMA, March 17, 1999; 281(11): 1014 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sawert, E. Girardi, G. Antonucci, M. C. Raviglione, P. Viale, G. Ippolito, and for the Gruppo Italiano di Studio Tubercolosi e AI Preventive Therapy for Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Persons: Analysis of Policy Options Based on Tuberculin Status and CD4+Cell Count Arch Intern Med, October 26, 1998; 158(19): 2112 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |