Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kradjan, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoene, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kradjan, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schoene, R. B.

Chest, Vol 101, 1545-1551, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Effect of age on bronchodilator response

WA Kradjan, NK Driesner, TH Abuan, G Emmick and RB Schoene
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle 98195.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the differential effects of age and drug type on bronchodilator response. DESIGN: The design was an unblinded, randomized crossover study. SETTING: An ambulatory pulmonary drug study unit was the setting. PATIENTS: Nineteen young (18 to 25 yr) and 17 elderly (greater than 65 yr) stable asthmatic subjects were studied. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Albuterol or ipratropium was given on two separate mornings using an MDI with extender. Subjects inhaled two puffs initially and then one puff every 30 min to a total of six puffs. Pulmonary function, blood pressure, and pulse were measured at baseline and every 30 min for 3 h. RESULTS: All subjects had a greater than 15 percent increase in FEV1 with one or both drugs. More patients responded to albuterol than to ipratropium in both age groups. The maximum percentage of change from baseline was greater (p less than 0.05) with albuterol (mean, 40.1 percent in young and 60.5 percent in old) than with ipratropium (21.2 percent in young; 31.2 percent in old) in both groups. These differences remain significant after correction for baseline differences using area-under-the-curve analysis of the percent of maximum improvement; however, the differences between age groups for the same drug were not statistically significant by either index of change. There were also no differences between drugs or between age groups for time (or number of puffs) to reach maximum improvement (mean, 2.0 to 2.2 h for albuterol and 1.6 to 1.7 h for ipratropium). The changes in FVC and FEF25-75% were similar to FEV1. Changes in blood pressure and pulse were not significant. Three subjects stopped therapy with albuterol with side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Both drugs are effective bronchodilators in young and old asthmatic subjects, but albuterol results in a greater magnitude of response in both age groups. Age is not a predictor of response to either drug.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
A. A. Lone
Respiratory Disorders of the Elderly
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2000; 13(4): 297 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.