Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gerrity, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gerrity, T. R.

Chest, Vol 102, 412-416, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Ineffectiveness of cough for enhancing mucus clearance in asymptomatic smokers

WD Bennett, WF Chapman and TR Gerrity
Center for Environmental Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.

Using monodisperse aerosols radiolabeled with 99mTc, we studied the effectiveness of cough and rapid inhalations for clearing mucus in ten asymptomatic smokers. On three separate study days, each subject breathed 5 microns (MMAD) 99mTc-iron oxide particles under controlled breathing conditions. While seated in front of a gamma camera, retention (R) of lung activity (measured as a percent of initial activity) was measured over the initial 2 h and again at 24 h following particle inhalation. On the control day the subject sat quietly in front of the camera, while on the cough day each subject performed 60 controlled coughs during the first hour of retention measurements, and on the rapid inhalation study day each subject performed 90 rapid inhalations during the first hour of retention measurements. Because breathing patterns were controlled during particle inhalation, initial lung deposition patterns were matched on control, cough, and rapid inhalation study days. By paired analysis, retentions at both 1 and 2 h (R1 and R2) for the cough and rapid inhalation measurements were not significantly different from control (mean control R1 = 69 percent; mean cough R1 = 66 percent; mean rapid inhalation R1 = 66 percent, NS; and mean control R2 = 59 percent, mean cough R2 = 55 percent; mean rapid inhalation R2 = 54 percent, NS). Retention at 24 h (R24) was not significantly different between cough, rapid inhalation, and control measurements (mean cough R24 = 15 percent, mean rapid inhalation R24 = 14 percent, mean control R24 = 17 percent). In other words, these young smokers with normal pulmonary function were unable to enhance their rate of mucus clearance by coughing. The inability of these young smokers to enhance their mucus clearance by cough suggests a change in the mucociliary apparatus from normal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
F. D. McCool
Global Physiology and Pathophysiology of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 48S - 53S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. D. BENNETT, K. L. ZEMAN, C. FOY, C. L. SHAFFER, F. L. JOHNSON, J. A. REGNIS, A. SANNUTI, and J. JOHNSON
Effect of Aerosolized Uridine 5'-Triphosphate on Mucociliary Clearance in Mild Chronic Bronchitis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2001; 164(2): 302 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.