Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichler, I
Right arrow Articles by Kofinger, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eichler, I
Right arrow Articles by Kofinger, A

Chest, Vol 102, 753-758, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Distilled water challenges in asthmatic children. Comparison of different protocols

I Eichler, M Gotz, J Zarkovic and A Kofinger
Department of Pediatrics, Vienna University Hospital, Austria.

Inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW) appears a promising candidate for routine challenge testing in bronchial asthma. We have compared two different methods of application of UNDW in 12 asthmatic children with a positive response to methacholine provocation (MCh), in an attempt to increase UNDW sensitivity and to establish standard testing protocols. In addition, results from UNDW challenges were compared to responses to inhalation of jet-nebulized distilled water (JNDW) and cold air (CACh). Compared to MCh, the sensitivity of continuously or intermittently (iUNDW) inhaled UNDW was 67 percent or 75 percent, respectively, when a positive response was defined by a greater than or equal to 20 percent fall in FEV1, but was higher when definition of a positive response was based on results from flow volume curves. Sensitivity of continuous or intermittent inhalation of JNDW was lower than for UNDW. The UNDW inhalations were better tolerated than CACh. Following stepwise iUNDW challenge, there was a clear reaction plateau for all variables measured. Results indicate that testing protocols with iUNDW inhalations over 6 to 10 min (corresponding to 7 to 11 ml water inhalation) yield the maximum sensitivity attainable with UNDW challenges, and require a minimum of patient and investigator effort.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. S. Fedan, L.-X. Yuan, V. C. Chang, J. O. Viola, D. Cutler, and L. L. Pettit
Osmotic Regulation of Airway Reactivity by Epithelium
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1999; 289(2): 901 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.