Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedullo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shayne, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fedullo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shayne, D.

Chest, Vol 102, 1683-1686, Copyright © 1992 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after coronary artery bypass surgery

AJ Fedullo, RM Lerner, J Gibson and DS Shayne
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester General Hospital, NY 14621.

Forty-eight patients were prospectively evaluated following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in order to determine values for diaphragmatic mobility by sonography, to compare diaphragmatic motion to chest x-ray findings, to relate diaphragmatic motion to pulmonary function tests, and to determine whether use of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), aortic cross-clamp time, or other clinical variables were predictive of diaphragmatic dysfunction. Mean left diaphragmatic motion was 2.8 +/- 1.1 cm (range, 1.0 to 5.7 cm), mean right diaphragmatic motion was 3.9 +/- 1.1 cm (range, 1.8 to 6.4 cm), and ratio of left to right motion was 0.74 +/- 0.27 (range, 0.19 to 1.4). Forty-one patients had normally positioned diaphragms on the chest x-ray film; four of these had poor mobility by ultrasonography (< 1.6 cm). Of the seven elevated left hemidiaphragms on chest x-ray films, three had an excursion of 1.6 cm or more by ultrasonography. The mean FVC for all patients was 59 +/- 13 percent of predicted. There was no relationship between diaphragmatic mobility and FVC or negative inspiratory pressure. The diaphragmatic motion in 36 patients having LIMA grafting was similar to those without (2.7 +/- 1.2 cm [n = 36] vs 2.8 +/- 0.8 cm [n = 12], respectively). Aortic cross-clamp time and respiratory symptoms also did not correlate with diaphragmatic mobility. Sonography can be used in the evaluation of diaphragmatic motion after CABG and may be more accurate in detecting a poorly mobile diaphragm than is the chest x-ray film.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. S. G. Toledo, S. K. Kodaira, P. C. B. Massarollo, O. I. Pereira, J. C. Dalmas, G. G. Cerri, and C. A. Buchpiguel
Left Hemidiaphragmatic Mobility: Assessment With Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Craniocaudal Displacement of the Splenic Hilum and the Inferior Pole of the Spleen
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Hagl, W. Harringer, B. Gohrbandt, and A. Haverich
Site of Pleural Drain Insertion and Early Postoperative Pulmonary Function Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Internal Mammary Artery
Chest, March 1, 1999; 115(3): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. C. Kocis, P. J. Radell, W. I. Sternberger, J. E. Benson, R. J. Traystman, and D. G. Nichols
Ultrasound evaluation of piglet diaphragm function before and after fatigue
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1997; 83(5): 1654 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J.-L. Diehl, F. Lofaso, P. Deleuze, T. Similowski, F. Lemaire, and L. Brochard
Clinically relevant diaphragmatic dysfunction after cardiac operations
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Chest Physicians.