Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roach, J.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roach, J.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, Y.

Chest, Vol 103, 1755-1758, Copyright © 1993 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

The effect of pyridostigmine on bronchial hyperreactivity

JM Roach, AH Eliasson and YY Phillips
Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.

We examined the effect of pyridostigmine (PY) at a dose of 30 mg orally three times a day on nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in ten normal nonsmokers (NNS), ten smokers (SM), and ten mild asthmatics (AS). We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, randomly assigning subjects to receive either placebo (PL) or PY before undergoing bronchoprovocation challenge with eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) using dry gas. Compliance with PY was confirmed by measuring red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (Achase) levels during both days of testing. While taking PL, the mean (+/- SEM) falls in FVC and FEV1 after the bronchoprovocation were as follows: NNS, 1.0 percent (+/- 0.6) FVC and 4.3 percent (+/- 1.0) FEV1; SM, 2.4 percent (+/- 1.1) FVC and 2.7 percent (+/- 1.3) FEV1; AS, 5.3 percent (+/- 2.3) FVC and 11.5 percent (+/- 2.8) FEV1. The mean decreases in FVC and FEV1 while taking PY were as follows: NNS, 1.8 percent (+/- 0.7) FVC and 4.3 percent (+/- 0.8) FEV1; SM, 3.8 percent (+/- 1.4) FVC and 5.2 percent (+/- 1.6) FEV1; AS, 4.4 percent (+/- 1.3) FVC and 11.8 percent (+/- 2.8) FEV1. Within each category, using a paired t test to compare the results on each day of testing, no statistically significant differences were noted. Pyridostigmine at the tested dose has no significant effect on nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in normal NNS, SM, or AS.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Chest Physicians.