Chest, Vol 103, 1769-1773, Copyright © 1993 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Comparison of snoring measured at home and during polysomnographic studies

F Series, I Marc and L Atton
Unite de Recherche, Centre de Pneumologie de l'hopital Laval, Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Snoring characteristics depend on several factors (sleep position, sleep architecture, breathing route) that can be influenced by changes in sleep habits and by the presence of the different probes and electrodes during polysomnographic studies. Our objective in this study was to compare the characteristics of snoring in the home environment with those of the sleep laboratory where most conventional studies are carried out. Fourteen nonapneic snorers were subjected to three night recording sessions within a two-week period, two at home and one in the sleep laboratory. To eliminate any sleep interference by the apparatus, breathing sounds were recorded with two microphones symmetrically placed on either side of the bed, the signal being preamplified and stored on a VHS hi-fi video recorder. The recorded signal was analyzed by using a spectrum analyzer (real time analyzer) and an equalizer to correct for acoustic resonances of the bedrooms. A snoring event was defined as a breathing sound with a sound pressure level (SPL) greater than 60 dB SPL. The snoring index (number/sleep hour) and the sound intensity of each event were automatically determined. The total sleep time (TST) was similar for the two home recordings (6.8 +/- 0.2 and 7.0 +/- 0.2 h, respectively, mean +/- SEM), but it was significantly shorter during the hospital study (6.0 +/- 0.3 h). The snoring indices obtained at home were 141.4 +/- 33.3 and 144.1 +/- 41.2/h and not statistically different from those obtained during the hospital recording (209.1 +/- 41.5/h). The percentage of TST spent above 60 dB SPL was significantly greater during the polysomnographic study (4.3 +/- 1.2 percent) than during the home recordings (2.5 +/- 0.7 and 2.9 +/- 1.0 percent, respectively). We conclude that the severity of snoring may be overestimated during polysomnographic recordings.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Larrosa, L. Hernandez, A. Morello, E. Ballester, L. Quinto, and J.M. Montserrat Laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty for snoring: does it meet the expectations? Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2004; 24(1): 66 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Smith and J. M. Battagel Non-apneic snoring and the orthodontist: the effectiveness of mandibular advancement splints J. Orthod., June 1, 2004; 31(2): 115 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. N. Liesching, C. Carlisle, A. Marte, A. Bonitati, and R. P. Millman Evaluation of the Accuracy of SNAP Technology Sleep Sonography in Detecting Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults Compared to Standard Polysomnography Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Verin, T. Similowski, A. Teixeira, and F. Series Discriminative power of phrenic twitch-induced dynamic response for diagnosis of sleep apnea during wakefulness J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Series and I. Marc Importance of sleep stage- and body position-dependence of sleep apnoea in determining benefits to auto-CPAP therapy Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 170 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Sériès and I Marc Nasal pressure recording in the diagnosis of sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome Thorax, June 1, 1999; 54(6): 506 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. SERIES, C. COTE, and S. ST. PIERRE Dysfunctional Mechanical Coupling of Upper Airway Tissues in Sleep Apnea Syndrome Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1999; 159(5): 1551 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. HOFFSTEIN, J. HAIGHT, P. COLE, and N. ZAMEL Does Snoring Contribute to Presbycusis? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1999; 159(4): 1351 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]