Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timsit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Carlet, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Timsit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Carlet, J

Chest, Vol 104, 104-108, Copyright © 1993 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Is protected specimen brush a reproducible method to diagnose ICU- acquired pneumonia?

JF Timsit, B Misset, S Francoual, FW Goldstein, P Vaury and J Carlet
Intensive Care Unit, Hopital Saint Joseph, Paris, France.

Protected specimen brush (PSB) is considered to be one of the standard methods for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, but to our knowledge, intraindividual variability in results has not been reported previously. PURPOSE: To compare the results of two PSB performed in the same subsegment on patients with suspected ICU- acquired pneumonia (IAP). STUDY DESIGN: Between October 1991 and April 1992, each mechanically ventilated patient with suspected IAP underwent bronchoscopy with two successive PSB in the lung segment identified as abnormal on radiographs. Results of the two PSB cultures were compared using 10(3) cfu/ml cutoff for a positive result. Four definite diagnoses were established during the follow up: definite pneumonia, probable pneumonia, excluded pneumonia, and uncertain pneumonia. POPULATION: Forty-two episodes in 26 patients were studied; 60 percent of patients received prior antibiotic therapy. Thirty-two microorganisms were isolated from 24 pairs of PSB. Definite diagnosis was definite pneumonia in 7, probable pneumonia in 8, excluded pneumonia in 17, and uncertain pneumonia in 10 cases. RESULTS: The PSB recovered the same microorganisms and argued for a good qualitative reproducibility. The distinction of positive and negative results on the basis of the 10(3) cfu/ml classic threshold was less reproducible. For 24 percent of the microorganisms recovered and in 16.7 percent of episodes of suspected IAP, the two consecutive samples gave results spread out on each side of the 10(3) cfu/ml cutoff. Discordance was higher when definite diagnosis was certain or probable than when diagnosis was excluded (p = 0.015). There was no statistical effect of the order of samples between the two specimens for bacterial index and microorganism concentrations. CONCLUSION: These findings argue for the poor repeatability of PSB in suspected IAP and question the yield of the 10(3) cfu/ml threshold. In attempting to diagnose IAP, the results of PSB must be interpreted with caution considering the intraindividual variability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Klompas
Does This Patient Have Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
JAMA, April 11, 2007; 297(14): 1583 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. M. Koenig and J. D. Truwit
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 637 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Rosell, E. Monso, N. Soler, F. Torres, J. Angrill, G. Riise, R. Zalacain, J. Morera, and A. Torres
Microbiologic Determinants of Exacerbation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Arch Intern Med, April 25, 2005; 165(8): 891 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Gauvin, J. Lacroix, M.-C. Guertin, F. Proulx, C. A. Farrell, A. Moghrabi, P. Lebel, and C. Dassa
Reproducibility of Blind Protected Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Mechanically Ventilated Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2002; 165(12): 1618 - 1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. Chastre and J.-Y. Fagon
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 867 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
B. Herer, C. Fuhrman, D. Demontrond, Z. Gazevic, B. Housset, and C. Chouaid
Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in medical ward: repeatability of the protected specimen brush
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 157 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Ioanas, R. Ferrer, J. Angrill, M. Ferrer, and A. Torres
Microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 791 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. San Pedro
Are Quantitative Cultures Useful in the Diagnosis of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia?
Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2_suppl): 385S - 390S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. S. Morehead and S. J. Pinto
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Arch Intern Med, July 10, 2000; 160(13): 1926 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. S. Niederman
Bronchoscopy in Nonresolving Nosocomial Pneumonia
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4_suppl_2): 212S - 218S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. E. Marik and P. Careau
The Role of Anaerobes in Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia and Aspiration Pneumonia: A Prospective Study
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Chest Physicians.