Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, R

Chest, Vol 104, 1108-1113, Copyright © 1993 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Inhaled beta 2-agonist and positive expiratory pressure in bronchial asthma. Influence on airway resistance and functional residual capacity

EF Christensen, O Norregaard, LW Jensen and R Dahl
Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.

INTRODUCTION: Positive expiratory airway pressure seems to dilate narrowed or collapsed airways, but this may be accompanied by a maintained and harmful increase in resting lung volume in obstructive pulmonary disease. PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of inhaled terbutaline and positive expiratory pressure (PEP) on airway resistance (Raw) and functional residual capacity (FRC) in bronchial asthma. DESIGN: Randomized crossover design, single blind with regard to inhaled medication, open with regard to PEP (PEP can be felt). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with bronchial asthma inhaled placebo and terbutaline in doses of 0.125 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1.5 mg by cone spacer combined with a facemask giving 0, 10, or 15 cm H2O PEP on separate days. FRC and Raw were measured by body plethysmography before and after inhalations. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance with terbutaline dose and PEP as factor levels. RESULTS: The effect of terbutaline: Raw decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) after 0.125 mg and 1.5 mg. The FRC did not change significantly. The effect of PEP: Raw decreased, but significantly only when the dose of 1.5 mg terbutaline was excluded from the analysis. Raw decreased with PEP 10 and 15 cm H2O, mean 0.6 (95 percent CI: -1.1, -0.2) and 0.9 (95 percent CI: -1.3, -0.4) cm H2O/L/s. The FRC did not change significantly with the PEP level. CONCLUSION: PEP only had influence on Raw when insufficient doses of terbutaline were inhaled, whereas once an efficient dose of terbutaline was administered, significant bronchodilation was achieved with or without PEP. Positive expiratory pressure did not increase FRC.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Chest Physicians.