Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Riordan, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Riordan, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C.

Chest, Vol 105, 396-401, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Regional deposition and regional ventilation during inhalation of pentamidine

TG O'Riordan and GC Smaldone
Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

In most patients, the deposition of aerosolized pentamidine (AP) is less in the apex of the lung relative to the base. As the apex of the lung is relatively less ventilated than the base, it is possible that reduced regional ventilation may explain the inhomogeneity in regional drug deposition. The purpose of this study was to measure the relationship between regional deposition of AP and regional ventilation, and the influence of particle size and airway caliber on this relationship. Ten subjects with HIV infection who were receiving prophylaxis with AP were recruited. Using krypton (81mKr), we measured regional ventilation during treatment with AP, labeled with 99mTc. Two nebulizers were used (Respirgard II and Fisoneb) that produced particles of different size. In addition, patients were studied with and without a bronchodilator because changes in airway geometry can affect sites of particle deposition. There was no significant correlation between regional ventilation and regional particle deposition (r = 0.00, linear regression). Particle deposition in the upper lobes relative to the lower lobes was less than would be predicted by regional ventilation, by a ratio of 0.84 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SE). Using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the upper to lower zone deposition pattern was not affected by either nebulizer or by the use of albuterol. The Fisoneb had significantly more central deposition relative to the jet nebulizer (mean +/- SE, skC/P: Fisoneb 1.3 +/- 0.1, Respirgard 1.1 +/- 0.1, p = 0.005, two-way ANOVA). The use of a bronchodilator did not significantly affect the central/peripheral deposition pattern. We conclude that differences in deposition between upper and lower lung regions are not accounted for simply by differences in regional ventilation in patients undergoing prophylaxis with AP. In assessing the cause of regional inhomogeneities of pharmaceutical aerosol deposition (and in devising strategies to achieve more uniform distribution), regional ventilation should be measured directly rather than be inferred from the deposition pattern of the aerosol.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.