Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pennock, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P.

Chest, Vol 105, 441-444, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Noninvasive nasal mask ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Institution of a new therapeutic technology for routine use

BE Pennock, L Crawshaw and PD Kaplan
Department of Medicine, College of Pennsylvania, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh 15212.

OBJECTIVE: We successfully implemented the delivery of noninvasive mechanical ventilation for patients with acute respiratory failure, a previously controversial use of this technique, using a simplified ventilator (BiPAP) with nasal mask. Pilot work showed this mode of support to be effective when administered by the members of a research team, and in the current study we were able to transfer this responsibility to usual care providers. SETTING: Almost 90 percent of the patients in this study were in either the 16-bed medical or 31-bed surgical intensive care units at our hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred ten hemodynamically stable patients with acute respiratory failure being considered for intubation and mechanical ventilation participated in this study. Eighty percent were surgical patients, most of whom had hypercapnic failure. INTERVENTION: Patients were administered noninvasive ventilatory support using a ventilatory support system (BiPAP) applied with a nasal mask. This intervention was administered by a research team in the initial 31 patients (special care, phase 1). The administration was transferred to usual care personnel in the next 45 patients (transition, phase 2). Usual care personnel almost exclusively administered care in the final 34 patients (usual care, phase 3). RESULTS: Withdrawal of ventilatory support for greater than 48 h (successful outcome) was about the same during usual care (phase 3, 80 percent) as it was during special care (phase 1, 76 percent).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
T. Liesching, H. Kwok, and N. S. Hill
Acute Applications of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 699 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. P. Keenan, C. Powers, D. G. McCormack, and G. Block
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation for Postextubation Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, June 26, 2002; 287(24): 3238 - 3244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Thys, G. Liistro, O. Dozin, E. Marion, and D.O. Rodenstein
Determinants of Fi,O2 with oxygen supplementation during noninvasive two-level positive pressure ventilation
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 653 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Wysocki and M. Antonelli
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 209 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. CARLUCCI, J.-C. RICHARD, M. WYSOCKI, E. LEPAGE, L. BROCHARD, and the SRLF Collaborative Group o
Noninvasive Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation . An Epidemiologic Survey
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 874 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. MEHTA and N. S. HILL
Noninvasive Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2001; 163(2): 540 - 577.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
International Consensus Conferences in Intensive Care Medicine: Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure . Organized Jointly by the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise, and approved by the ATS Board of Directors, December 2000
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2001; 163(1): 283 - 291.
[Full Text]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
A. M Cross
Review of the role of non-invasive ventilation in the emergency department
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2000; 17(2): 79 - 85.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J.-L. Diehl, D. Isabey, G. Desmarais, L. Brochard, A. Harf, and F. Lofaso
Physiological effects of alveolar, tracheal, and "standard" pressure supports
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1999; 87(1): 428 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.