Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.

Chest, Vol 105, 661-666, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Normal range of methacholine responsiveness in relation to prechallenge pulmonary function. The Normative Aging Study

GT O'Connor, D Sparrow and ST Weiss
Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine.

Methacholine airway responsiveness has been observed to be related to prechallenge level of pulmonary function; however, normal ranges of responsiveness for specific levels of lung function have not been reported. We examined methacholine airway responsiveness in relation to level of prechallenge pulmonary function in a sample of 547 middle-aged and elderly men who denied any history of respiratory illness or symptoms and who had normal levels of prechallenge FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio. The cumulative dose of methacholine provoking a 20 percent decline in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) was positively correlated with prechallenge FEV1 percent predicted (Spearman correlation r = 0.35, p < 0.0001). The fifth percentile of PD20FEV1, chosen as an estimate of the lower limit of the normal range, varied with the level of prechallenge FEV1. When applied to a larger sample of 838 men with normal pulmonary function, the use of FEV1-specific cut-off values to separate "normal" from "abnormal" PD20FEV1 did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of methacholine challenge as a test for questionnaire-reported asthma or wheezing. These data provide lower limits of normal PD20FEV1 which are specific for a subject's prechallenge FEV1; however, these FEV1- specific lower limits of normal PD20FEV1 provided no greater sensitivity and specificity for detecting asthma and wheezing than did a single lower limit of normal PD20FEV1 for all subjects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.