Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Schans, C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Mark, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Schans, C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Mark, T.

Chest, Vol 105, 782-789, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Effects of positive expiratory pressure breathing during exercise in patients with COPD

CP van der Schans, W de Jong, G de Vries, WA Kaan, DS Postma, GH Koeter and TW van der Mark
University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Groningen, The Netherlands.

The effect of breathing with a positive expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O was investigated in eight patients with COPD (mean [SD]FEV1 = 54 [13] percent predicted). Specific work of breathing (Wsp) and myoelectrical activity of the following respiratory muscles were measured at rest: scalene muscle, parasternal muscle, and abdominal muscles. Minute ventilation (VE), end-tidal CO2 (FETCO2), physiologic dead space ventilation (VD/VT), oxygen uptake (VO2), and carbon dioxide output (VCO2) were measured at rest and during an incremental bicycle exercise test. Dyspnea sensation during exercise was quantified using the CR10 Borg-scale. All measurements were performed with and without positive expiratory pressure (PEP). During PEP breathing at rest mean (SEM) Wsp increased from 0.54 (0.13) J/L to 1.08 (0.10) J/L. The SEM VE decreased from 12.4 (1.0) L/min to 10.5 (1.1) L/min, and SEM VD/VT decreased from 0.39 (0.03) to 0.34 (0.03). There was a tendency for an increased phasic respiratory muscle activity during PEP breathing of all three muscles as compared with undisturbed breathing, but the changes were not statistically significant. During the exercise test with PEP, VE, VD/VT, VO2, and VCO2 were significantly lower, and FETCO2 was significantly higher as compared with the values obtained during the exercise test with undisturbed breathing. Dyspnea sensation during the exercise test with PEP, however, was higher than during the test with undisturbed breathing. The PEP breathing at rest may be useful in patients with COPD as it increases the efficiency of ventilation by reducing dead space ventilation. This beneficial effect also occurs during exercise, but here it is accompanied by increased dyspnea sensation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. Troosters, R. Casaburi, R. Gosselink, and M. Decramer
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2005; 172(1): 19 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.