Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palange, P.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palange, P.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, P.

Chest, Vol 105, 1122-1126, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians

ARTICLES

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation of patients with ventilatory vs circulatory causes of reduced exercise tolerance

P Palange, S Carlone, S Forte, P Galassetti and P Serra
II Patologia Medica, University La Sapienza Rome, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is considered a useful procedure in the evaluation of circulatory, ventilatory, or mixed origin of reduced exercise tolerance. Our study was designed to compare CPX and a standard clinical-instrumental approach in the evaluation of patients with cardiopulmonary disorders. METHODS: Fifty- seven patients (31 male, 26 female; mean [+/- SE] age, 60 +/- 2 years) were studied. Each patient was evaluated by two different observers: one used standard clinical criteria, the other used gas exchange indexes, monitored during a maximal incremental CPX, performed on a cycle ergometer. Cardiac output (CO), at rest and at submaximal work level, was also obtained. RESULTS: In 46 patients (80.7 percent), a concordant evaluation was reached by the two observers (24 were found to have a predominant ventilatory disorder, 22 to have a circulatory disorder); among these, in subjects considered to have circulatory impairment, the maximal CO/maximal workload ratio was significantly lower than in the ventilatory group; in those with ventilatory impairment, the reduced exercise tolerance correlated with the resting spirometric values. In the remaining 11 patients (19.3 percent), CPX better defined the underlying pathophysiology of exercise limitation: in 10 of them, clinically classified as having a mixed or predominantly ventilatory disorder, a greater importance of the circulatory component was detected; 4 had evidence of pulmonary vascular impairment (high VE/VCO2 at anaerobic threshold). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the sensitivity of CPX in the evaluation of a reduced exercise tolerance in dyspneic patients with cardiopulmonary conditions; when compared with a clinical-laboratory approach, in some patients it allowed the detection of an underestimated circulatory component causing exercise limitation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ThoraxHome page
N AMBROSINO
Field tests in pulmonary disease
Thorax, March 1, 1999; 54(3): 191 - 193.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.