Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sternberg, R
Right arrow Articles by Sahebjami, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sternberg, R
Right arrow Articles by Sahebjami, H

Chest, Vol 105, 1798-1803, Copyright © 1994 by American College of Chest Physicians


ARTICLES

Hemodynamic and oxygen transport characteristics of common ventilatory modes

R Sternberg and H Sahebjami
Pulmonary Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati 45220- 2213.

We studied hemodynamic and oxygen transport parameters in 12 stable critically ill patients on assist control (ACV), synchronized intermittent mandatory (SIMV), and pressure support (PSV) ventilatory modes. Patients were optimally ventilated on ACV, were awake, and capable of spontaneous breathing. After baseline measurements on ACV, patients were placed on SIMV and PSV for 30 min each and measurements were repeated at the end of each period. The SIMV rate (f) was 75 percent of the rate on ACV. The PSV was set at a level enough to maintain a tidal volume (VT) equal to that on ACV. The FIo2 was kept constant on all three modes. Patients on SIMV and PSV maintained similar minute ventilation as when on ACV but with significantly lower peak and mean inspiratory pressures than on ACV. However, f increased and VT decreased significantly on SIMV. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport parameters were not significantly different among the three groups, although there was a tendency toward higher cardiac index, oxygen transport, and oxygen consumption on SIMV and PSV. We conclude that in stable critically ill patients, SIMV and PSV used according to our study protocol for 30 min can provide adequate ventilation with lower airway pressure and possibly less adverse effects on hemodynamic and tissue oxygenation parameters compared with ACV. Because of a significant decrease in VT and an increase in f seen with SIMV, PSV may be a more desirable mode for ventilatory support.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. R. Pinsky
Cardiovascular Issues in Respiratory Care
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_2): 592S - 597S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.