Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S. K.
(Chest. 1994;106:366-372.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

The Relationship Between Oxygen Consumption and Work Rate in Patients With Airflow Obstruction

Michael I. Lewis M.D.1; Michael J. Belman M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Stephen A. Monn M.D., F.C.C.P.1; Janet D. Elashoff Ph.D.1; and Spencer K. Koerner M.D., F.C.C.P.1

1 From the Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles

The oxygen cost of augmented ventilation is increased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, either at rest or during exercise. Thus, if excessive demands are placed on the respiratory muscles during exercise in these patients, we postulate that the total oxygen consumption (Vo2) may increase relative to the work rate compared to control subjects. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between Vo2 and work rate during exercise in patients with airflow obstruction. A retrospective analysis of data collected over 7 years was conducted. Patients with airflow obstruction (n= 131) were compared and contrasted with those in whom pulmonary function studies (spirometry, lung volumes) were normal (n=199). Severity of airflow obstruction (ie, mild moderate, severe) was determined, using the 95 percent confidence limits for the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. Incremental exercise studies were performed on a cycle ergometer. Resting Vo2 was not significantly different across the groups with airflow obstruction measured either directly or normalized for body weight. The Vo2max was significantly reduced in the patients with severe airflow obstruction, compared with the normal group, as well as the patients with mild and moderate airflow obstruction. No differences were noted in the slope of Vo2 plotted against work rate in the patients with airflow obstruction (regardless of the severity of the obstruction) and individuals in whom results of pulmonary function tests were normal. In addition, when gender was taken into account, there was essentially no difference in the slopes for either male or female subjects across all groups. Stepwise, linear regression failed to demonstrate any variable or variables that were strongly related to slope. We postulate that the maintenance of a normal slope of Vo2 on work rate in patients with airflow obstruction, in whom the oxygen cost and work of breathing is likely increased, may mask a significant reduction in nonrespiratory Vo2 (for example, to exercising skeletal muscles).

Submitted on May 14, 1993
Accepted on November 10, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.