Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hampson, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hampson, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, M. P.
(Chest. 1994;106:462-465.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

Reduction in Patient Timing Errors Using A Breath-activated Metered Dose Inhaler

Neil B. Hampson M.D., F.C.C.P.1 and Manfred P. Mueller M.D., F.C.C.P.2

1 From the Virginia Mason Clinic, Seattle
2 From Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beech Grove, Indiana

Delivery of aerosol medication to the lower respiratory tract by metered dose inhaler (MDI) is often limited by the patient's inability to properly coordinate activation of the device with inspiration. This study evaluated a new breath-activated MDI device, designed to minimize patient timing errors by sensing inspiratory flow and automatically activating to deliver aerosol medication. Twenty novice adult volunteers, previously naive to the technique of MDI use, and 20 patients currently using MDIs were tested in their ability to coordinate MDI usage. Simultaneous recording of respiratory events and device activation allowed analysis of timing errors. With a conventional MDI, a 31.0 percent incidence of errors was seen in the novice group and a 21.5 percent incidence of errors was seen in the experienced group. These compared with error rates using the breath-activated MDI of 6.5 percent and 5.0 percent in the two groups respectively (p=0.009, p=0.04). The breath-activated inhaler was preferred by 35 of 40 subjects. In conclusion, MDI technique timing errors were significantly less with this breath-activated MDI device in both novice and experienced subjects, and it was also preferred by both groups.

Key Words: aerosol therapy • asthma • metered-dose inhalers

Submitted on July 6, 1993
Accepted on December 3, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.