Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sagel, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sagel, S. S.
(Chest. 1994;106:1036-1041.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

Chest Radiography in Patients With Early Stage Prostatic Carcinoma

Effect on Treatment Planning and Cost Analysis

Howard P. Forman M.D.1; Lee A. Fox B.S.1; Harvey S. Glazer M.D.1; Bruce L. McClennan M.D.1; D. Claire Anderson M.D.1; and Stuart S. Sagel M.D.1

1 From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis

Study objective: An evaluation of the impact of routine preoperative chest radiographs was retrospectively undertaken in a pilot group of 292 patients with prostatic carcinoma who were part of a prospective study of prostate specific antigen screening for prostate carcinoma.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Hospital-based outpatients.

Patients and participants: A cost-effectiveness model was used to assess the value of routine chest radiography in this patient population. Chest radiography findings were categorized into four groups based on follow-up and impact.

Measurements and results: Forty-three patients (15 percent) had a total of 45 positive findings on their chest radiographs. No patient had intrathoracic metastases from prostatic carcinoma. Only two patients (both with unsuspected second neoplasms) had findings that impacted on their treatment and one avoided retropubic radical prostatectomy. Total cost was $2,000 (based on Medicare reimbursement), or $14,000 (based on physician and hospital charges).

Conclusion: Although benefit is small in terms of number of patients affected, clinical impact, in the two patients with significant findings, was great. Although cost-effectiveness cannot be confirmed on the basis of this series, further evaluation of its utility for this application should be undertaken.

Key Words: cancer screening • clinical efficacy • cost analysis • prostatic neoplasms • thoracic radiography

Submitted on September 9, 1993
Accepted on February 4, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.