|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
Objectives: This study was designed to assess whether a new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), termed active compression-decompression CPR, or ACD-CPR, improves organ perfusion when compared with standard (S) CPR in a dog model of ventricular fibrillation.
Background: ACD-CPR has recently been shown to improve hemodynamic and respiratory parameters during cardiac arrest when compared with standard CPR. However, to our knowledge, the effects of ACD-CPR on tissue perfusion have not been investigated.
Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was induced in eight anesthetized, intubated animals. ACD-CPR and standard CPR were each performed twice in alternating order. All interventions were preceded by 1 min of ventricular fibrillation, in which no CPR was performed, and consisted of 6 min of CPR with either technique during which tissue perfusion was measured. Compressions were performed at 80/min with a 50 percent duty cycle and 175 to 200 N downward force applied to the chest wall for both techniques. Epinephrine was administered at the beginning of each 6-min CPR interval. Hemodynamic monitoring of aortic and right atrial pressure was performed continuously and myocardial, cerebral, and renal blood flows were measured using the radiolabeled microsphere technique at baseline and during all interventions.
Results: Baseline organ perfusion and hemodynamics were similar for all dogs. Baseline left ventricular, brain, and renal blood flows were 62.0±5.5, 14.1±2.1, and 476.3±55.5 ml/min/100 g, respectively (mean±SEM). Compared with standard CPR, ACD-CPR resulted in higher global left ventricular (22.5±6.2 vs 14.1±4.0 ml/min/100 g, p<0.01), cerebral (12.0±2.4 vs 8.5±2.3 ml/min/100 g, p<0.01), and renal cortical (27.8±5.0 vs 17.5±5.0 ml/min/100 g, p<0.05) blood flows. Regional flows to the epicardium, endocardium, and midmyocardium as well as to the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes of the brain were all significantly improved by ACD-CPR. Aortic systolic (61.7±4.1 vs 49.5±3.1 mm Hg, p<0.01), aortic mean (31.6±2.8 vs 27.2±2.2 mm Hg, p=0.001), and myocardial perfusion pressure (12.9±3.4 vs 10.4±3.4 mm Hg, ACD-CPR vs standard CPR, p<0.01) were all higher during ACD-CPR than during standard CPR.
Conclusions: We conclude that ACD-CPR improves tissue perfusion and systemic hemodynamics compared with standard CPR.
Key Words: cardiopulmonary resuscitation cerebral blood flow hemodynamics left ventricular blood flow renal blood flow
Submitted on September 2, 1993
Accepted on February 3, 1994
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Lurie, T. Zielinski, S. McKnite, T. Aufderheide, and W. Voelckel Use of an Inspiratory Impedance Valve Improves Neurologically Intact Survival in a Porcine Model of Ventricular Fibrillation Circulation, January 1, 2002; 105(1): 124 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Plaisance, K. G. Lurie, and D. Payen Inspiratory Impedance During Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation : A Randomized Evaluation in Patients in Cardiac Arrest Circulation, March 7, 2000; 101(9): 989 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Babbs CPR Techniques That Combine Chest and Abdominal Compression and Decompression : Hemodynamic Insights From a Spreadsheet Model Circulation, November 23, 1999; 100(21): 2146 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Plaisance, F. Adnet, E. Vicaut, B. Hennequin, P. Magne, C. Prudhomme, Y. Lambert, J.-P. Cantineau, C. Leopold, C. Ferracci, et al. Benefit of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation as a Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support: A Randomized Multicenter Study Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 955 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Lurie, P. Coffeen, J. Shultz, S. McKnite, B. Detloff, and K. Mulligan Improving Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With an Inspiratory Impedance Valve Circulation, March 15, 1995; 91(6): 1629 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |