Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. W.
(Chest. 1994;106:1250-1259.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

Active Compression-Decompression CPR Improves Vital Organ Perfusion in a Dog Model of Ventricular Fibrillation

Mark W. Chang M.D.1; Paul Coffeen M.D.1; Keith G. Lurie M.D.1; Jeffrey Shultz M.D.1; Robert J. Bache M.D.1; and Carl W. White M.D.1

1 From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis

Objectives: This study was designed to assess whether a new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), termed active compression-decompression CPR, or ACD-CPR, improves organ perfusion when compared with standard (S) CPR in a dog model of ventricular fibrillation.

Background: ACD-CPR has recently been shown to improve hemodynamic and respiratory parameters during cardiac arrest when compared with standard CPR. However, to our knowledge, the effects of ACD-CPR on tissue perfusion have not been investigated.

Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was induced in eight anesthetized, intubated animals. ACD-CPR and standard CPR were each performed twice in alternating order. All interventions were preceded by 1 min of ventricular fibrillation, in which no CPR was performed, and consisted of 6 min of CPR with either technique during which tissue perfusion was measured. Compressions were performed at 80/min with a 50 percent duty cycle and 175 to 200 N downward force applied to the chest wall for both techniques. Epinephrine was administered at the beginning of each 6-min CPR interval. Hemodynamic monitoring of aortic and right atrial pressure was performed continuously and myocardial, cerebral, and renal blood flows were measured using the radiolabeled microsphere technique at baseline and during all interventions.

Results: Baseline organ perfusion and hemodynamics were similar for all dogs. Baseline left ventricular, brain, and renal blood flows were 62.0±5.5, 14.1±2.1, and 476.3±55.5 ml/min/100 g, respectively (mean±SEM). Compared with standard CPR, ACD-CPR resulted in higher global left ventricular (22.5±6.2 vs 14.1±4.0 ml/min/100 g, p<0.01), cerebral (12.0±2.4 vs 8.5±2.3 ml/min/100 g, p<0.01), and renal cortical (27.8±5.0 vs 17.5±5.0 ml/min/100 g, p<0.05) blood flows. Regional flows to the epicardium, endocardium, and midmyocardium as well as to the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes of the brain were all significantly improved by ACD-CPR. Aortic systolic (61.7±4.1 vs 49.5±3.1 mm Hg, p<0.01), aortic mean (31.6±2.8 vs 27.2±2.2 mm Hg, p=0.001), and myocardial perfusion pressure (12.9±3.4 vs 10.4±3.4 mm Hg, ACD-CPR vs standard CPR, p<0.01) were all higher during ACD-CPR than during standard CPR.

Conclusions: We conclude that ACD-CPR improves tissue perfusion and systemic hemodynamics compared with standard CPR.

Key Words: cardiopulmonary resuscitation • cerebral blood flow • hemodynamics • left ventricular blood flow • renal blood flow

Submitted on September 2, 1993
Accepted on February 3, 1994




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. G. Lurie, T. Zielinski, S. McKnite, T. Aufderheide, and W. Voelckel
Use of an Inspiratory Impedance Valve Improves Neurologically Intact Survival in a Porcine Model of Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation, January 1, 2002; 105(1): 124 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Plaisance, K. G. Lurie, and D. Payen
Inspiratory Impedance During Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation : A Randomized Evaluation in Patients in Cardiac Arrest
Circulation, March 7, 2000; 101(9): 989 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. F. Babbs
CPR Techniques That Combine Chest and Abdominal Compression and Decompression : Hemodynamic Insights From a Spreadsheet Model
Circulation, November 23, 1999; 100(21): 2146 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Plaisance, F. Adnet, E. Vicaut, B. Hennequin, P. Magne, C. Prudhomme, Y. Lambert, J.-P. Cantineau, C. Leopold, C. Ferracci, et al.
Benefit of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation as a Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support: A Randomized Multicenter Study
Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. G. Lurie, P. Coffeen, J. Shultz, S. McKnite, B. Detloff, and K. Mulligan
Improving Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With an Inspiratory Impedance Valve
Circulation, March 15, 1995; 91(6): 1629 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.