|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif.
To evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive estimates of VD/VT in clinical exercise testing, we compared measurements of standard VD/VT with estimates based either on end-tidal CO2 (VD/VTET) or a published estimate of arterial Pco2 (VD/VTest) at peak exercise in 68 patients. Using regression analysis, we identified highly significant differences (p<0.001) between each method and VD/VTstand across a broad range of observed VD/VT. Assuming a normal exercise VD/VT
0.30, estimate methods were specific but were insensitive (50 percent for VD/VTET and 57 percent for VD/VTest) for identifying patients with abnormal gas exchange during exercise. Separate analysis of subgroups based on resting pulmonary function did not identify any group for which either method was acceptable. Our analysis showed that errors in estimating PaCO2, which are amplified by the Bohr equation when calculating VD/VT, are responsible for the inaccuracies of each noninvasive method. We conclude that noninvasive estimates of PaCO2 cannot replace measured arterial Pco2 for calculation of VD/VT during exercise.
Key Words: exercise gas exchange pulmonary ventilation VD/VT
Submitted on November 2, 1993
Accepted on March 11, 1994
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2003; 167(2): 211 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |