|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
2 From the Department of Lung Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
3 From the Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
4 From the Department of Lund, Sweden
The clinical effect of inhaled radio-labeled (Technetium-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid) methacholine was studied in two separate experiments performed in eight symptom-free asthmatics with bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Aerosols were formed by two different nebulizers, producing either mainly small aerosol particles (2-µm mass median aerodynamic diameter [MMAD]) for peripheral, or mainly large aerosol particles (9-µm MMAD) for large airway deposition. The intended site of deposition was confirmed by gamma camera recordings. Changes in specific airway conductance (sGaw) were set as an index of central airway constriction, and functional alterations in the gas exchanging parts of the lung were estimated by multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) and arterial blood gas analyses. The main finding was that the responses, as measured by the changes in arterial blood gases and by MIGET, were similar in the two experiments, while the fall in sGaw was significantly larger after deposition in the main bronchi than in the peripheral airways (p<0.05). The time courses of the abnormalities in the gas exchanging elements were much longer than those of the responses of the central airways, and the abnormalities were recorded still at the end of the experiment 2 h after challenge in most patients. A discrepancy in dose dependency and time courses suggests differences in mechanism and/or dynamics of the responses exerted by the various target organs. Interaction in the process of clearance from the lung of inhaled methacholine by the bronchial circulation may have contributed to the observed discrepancies.
Key Words: bronchial challenge lung function methacholine peripheral and central deposition
Submitted on November 1, 1993
Accepted on April 8, 1994
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Simard, H. Turcotte, D. W. Cockcroft, B. E. Davis, M.-E. Boulay, and L.-P. Boulet Deep Inspiration Avoidance and Methacholine Response in Normal Subjects and Patients With Asthma Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. ECHAZARRETA, B. DAHLEN, G. GARCIA, C. AGUSTI, J. A. BARBERA, J. ROCA, S.-E. DAHLEN, and R. RODRIGUEZ-ROISIN Pulmonary Gas Exchange and Sputum Cellular Responses to Inhaled Leukotriene D4 in Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2001; 164(2): 202 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.L. Echazarreta, F.P. Gomez, J. Ribas, E. Sala, J.A. Barbera, J. Roca, and R. Rodriguez-Roisin Pulmonary gas exchange responses to histamine and methacholine challenges in mild asthma Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 609 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, A. Van Muylem, M. Paiva, M. Noppen, and W. Vincken Ventilation distribution during histamine provocation J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 1907 - 1916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |