Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, K. J.
(Chest. 1994;106:1806-1810.)
© 1994 American College of Chest Physicians

The Composition of Gas Given by Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation During CPR

Volker Wenzel 1; Ahamed H. Idris MD2; Michael J. Banner PhD3; Ronnie S. Fuerst MD4; and Kelly J. Tucker MD5

1 From the Department of Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
2 From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
3 From the Departments of Anesthesiology, Physiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
4 From the Departments of Pediarics, Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
5 From the Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville

Study objective: To compare the concentration of a rescuer's exhaled O2 and CO2 during mouth-to-mouth ventilation with or without chest compression.

Design: Prospective repeated measures study. Simulated one-and two-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed as recommended by the American Heart Association.

Setting: University laboratory.

Participants: Fifty-five healthcare professionals certified in basic and advanced cardiac life support volunteered as rescuers in this study.

Measurements and results: Thirty-three volunteers performed one-rescuer CPR, and 22 volunteers performed two-rescuer CPR. Minute ventilation for both groups increased 50% to 130% during CPR (p<0.05). During the performance of CPR, the concentration of exhaled O2increased from 16.4 ± 0.7% to 16.9 ± 0.5% in the one-rescuer CPR group and from 16.5 ± 0.9%, to 17.8 ± 0.6% in the two-rescuer CPR group (p<0.05). The concentration of exhaled CO2 in the one-rescuer CPR group did not change significantly throughout the entire experiment, but decreased in the two-rescuer CPR group from a baseline measurement of 4.0 ± 0.6% to 3.5 ± 0.4% (p<0.05). During CPR, the concentration of exhaled CO2 was 4.0 ± 0.4% in the one-rescuer CPR group compared with 3.5 ± 0.4% in the two-rescuer CPR group (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The gas given by mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a hypercarbic and hypoxic mixture compared with room air. Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is the only circumstance in which a hypercarbic and hypoxic gas is given as therapy. Further laboratory and clinical studies are necessary to determine the effect of mouth-to-mouth ventilation during CPR.

Key Words: cardiac arrest • CO2 • heart-arrest-therapy • respiration-artificial • resuscitation

Submitted on March 24, 1994
Accepted on June 2, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 4: Adult Basic Life Support
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-19 - IV-34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Stallinger, V. Wenzel, S. Oroszy, V. D. Mayr, A. H. Idris, K. H. Lindner, and C. Hormann
The Effects of Different Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation Tidal Volumes on Gas Exchange During Simulated Rescue Breathing
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1265 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Berg, R. W. Hilwig, K. B. Kern, and G. A. Ewy
"Bystander" Chest Compressions and Assisted Ventilation Independently Improve Outcome From Piglet Asphyxial Pulseless "Cardiac Arrest"
Circulation, April 11, 2000; 101(14): 1743 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Berg, K. B. Kern, R. W. Hilwig, and G. A. Ewy
Assisted Ventilation During `Bystander' CPR in a Swine Acute Myocardial Infarction Model Does Not Improve Outcome
Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4364 - 4371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. B. Becker, R. A. Berg, P. E. Pepe, A. H. Idris, T. P. Aufderheide, T. A. Barnes, T. A. EdD, S. J. Stratton, and N. C. Chandra
A Reappraisal of Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation During Bystander-Initiated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Ventilation Working Group of the Basic Life Support and Pediatric Life Support Subcommittees, American Heart Association
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 2102 - 2112.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Chest Physicians.