|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Department of Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
2 From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
3 From the Departments of Anesthesiology, Physiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
4 From the Departments of Pediarics, Surgery (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
5 From the Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
Study objective: To compare the concentration of a rescuer's exhaled O2 and CO2 during mouth-to-mouth ventilation with or without chest compression.
Design: Prospective repeated measures study. Simulated one-and two-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed as recommended by the American Heart Association.
Setting: University laboratory.
Participants: Fifty-five healthcare professionals certified in basic and advanced cardiac life support volunteered as rescuers in this study.
Measurements and results: Thirty-three volunteers performed one-rescuer CPR, and 22 volunteers performed two-rescuer CPR. Minute ventilation for both groups increased 50% to 130% during CPR (p<0.05). During the performance of CPR, the concentration of exhaled O2increased from 16.4 ± 0.7% to 16.9 ± 0.5% in the one-rescuer CPR group and from 16.5 ± 0.9%, to 17.8 ± 0.6% in the two-rescuer CPR group (p<0.05). The concentration of exhaled CO2 in the one-rescuer CPR group did not change significantly throughout the entire experiment, but decreased in the two-rescuer CPR group from a baseline measurement of 4.0 ± 0.6% to 3.5 ± 0.4% (p<0.05). During CPR, the concentration of exhaled CO2 was 4.0 ± 0.4% in the one-rescuer CPR group compared with 3.5 ± 0.4% in the two-rescuer CPR group (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The gas given by mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a hypercarbic and hypoxic mixture compared with room air. Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is the only circumstance in which a hypercarbic and hypoxic gas is given as therapy. Further laboratory and clinical studies are necessary to determine the effect of mouth-to-mouth ventilation during CPR.
Key Words: cardiac arrest CO2 heart-arrest-therapy respiration-artificial resuscitation
Submitted on March 24, 1994
Accepted on June 2, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Part 4: Adult Basic Life Support Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-19 - IV-34. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stallinger, V. Wenzel, S. Oroszy, V. D. Mayr, A. H. Idris, K. H. Lindner, and C. Hormann The Effects of Different Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation Tidal Volumes on Gas Exchange During Simulated Rescue Breathing Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Berg, R. W. Hilwig, K. B. Kern, and G. A. Ewy "Bystander" Chest Compressions and Assisted Ventilation Independently Improve Outcome From Piglet Asphyxial Pulseless "Cardiac Arrest" Circulation, April 11, 2000; 101(14): 1743 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Berg, K. B. Kern, R. W. Hilwig, and G. A. Ewy Assisted Ventilation During `Bystander' CPR in a Swine Acute Myocardial Infarction Model Does Not Improve Outcome Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4364 - 4371. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Becker, R. A. Berg, P. E. Pepe, A. H. Idris, T. P. Aufderheide, T. A. Barnes, T. A. EdD, S. J. Stratton, and N. C. Chandra A Reappraisal of Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation During Bystander-Initiated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Ventilation Working Group of the Basic Life Support and Pediatric Life Support Subcommittees, American Heart Association Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 2102 - 2112. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |