Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alt, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Matula, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alt, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Matula, M. M.
(Chest. 1995;107:925-930.)
© 1995 American College of Chest Physicians

Intrinsic Heart Rate Response as a Predictor of Rate-Adaptive Pacing Benefit

Eckhard U. Alt MD1; Michael J. Schlegl 1; and Markus M. Matula MD1

1 From the 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität Miünchen, München, Germany

Objective: More than half of the pacemaker systems now being implanted can be rate adaptively paced. Our objective was to determine which patients benefit from rate-adaptive pacing in terms of improvement in maximum performance and aerobic capacity.

Methods: Thirty patients with implanted accelerometer-driven, rate-adaptive pacemakers underwent a standardized, ergospirometrically and maximally symptoms=limited cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) stress test with both rate-adaptive and fixed-rate stimulation in a randomized order. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the intrinsic heart rate achieved during maximum workload: group 1 achieved le90 beats per minute (bpm), group 2 achieved 90 to le110 bpm, and group 3 achieved >110 bpm.

Results: Group 1 demonstrated a significant increase (ple0.01) in maximum oxygen uptake from 16.4±5.6 mL/kg/min with fixed-rate pacing to 23.2±11.1 mL/kg/min (+41.5%) with rate-adaptive pacing. At the anaerobic threshold, oxygen uptake significantly increased (ple0.01) from 11.8±2.7 mL/kg/min to 15.7±5 mL/kg/min (+33.1%). Group 2 patients showed an increase in maximum oxygen uptake from 23.3±5.4 mL/kg/min to 25.3±4.9 mL/kg/min (+8.5%., ple0.05) as well as an increase in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold from 15.9±2.6 mL/kg/min to 18.1±2.9 mL/kg/min (+13.8%, p <0.05) with rate-adaptive pacing. Group 3 demonstrated no significant difference between the two pacing methods (from 25.6±9.4 mL/kg/min to 25.9±9.3 mL/kg/min and from 15.8±5.5 mL/kg/min to 16.3±6 mL/kg/min). No difference in maximum oxygen uptake and in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold was evident among the three groups when paced rate adaptively (not significant).

Conclusion: The second-generation, accelerometer controlled rate-adaptive pacemakers used in testing enabled a stress-oriented heart rate increase and an age- and gender-dependent adequate matching of maximum performance. The benefit from a rate-adaptive system to the patient increases as his or her chronotropic reserve limitation became more pronounced.

Key Words: accelerometer • aerobic capacity • intrinsic heart rate • rate-adaptive cardiac pacing

Submitted on May 6, 1994
Accepted on August 2, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Kindermann, B. Schwaab, N. Finkler, S. Schaller, M. Bohm, and G. Frohlig
Defining the optimum upper heart rate limit during exercise. A study in pacemaker patients with heart failure
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2002; 23(16): 1301 - 1308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. Lass, J. Kaik, K. Meigas, H. Hinrikus, and A. Blinowska
Evaluation of the quality of rate adaptation algorithms for cardiac pacing
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 221 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Chest Physicians.