Untreated Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

Outcome, Clinical, and Laboratory Assessment

¹ From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) among patients with PE who did not receive treatment to assess how the natural course of untreated PE relates to its severity.

Methods: Data are from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). Among patients with PE diagnosed either by pulmonary angiography or at autopsy, 376 received treatment and 24 escaped treatment in the hospital and were not prescribed anticoagulant therapy at the time of hospital discharge. Among these untreated patients, however, four received anticoagulant therapy during the first 3 months of follow-up. We report the 3-month course of PE in the remaining 20 untreated patients.

Results: Among untreated patients, 1 of 20 (5.0%) died from the effects of the original PE and possibly some contribution from recurrent PE. Nonfatal recurrent PE occurred in 1 of 20 (5.0%). All untreated patients, 20 of 20 (100%), had less than three mismatched segmental perfusion defects compared with 227 of 376 (60%) treated patients (p<0.001). Pulmonary arteries showed thromboemboli in segmental or smaller arteries in 16 of 19 (84%) untreated patients compared with 132 of 362 (36%) treated patients (p<0.001). Untreated and treated patients, when grouped according to the size of the ventilation/perfusion lung scan defect or size of vessels involved on the pulmonary angiogram, showed no statistically significant difference in the frequency of fatal PE or nonfatal recurrent PE.

Conclusion: Mild untreated PE carries a lower immediate mortality and lower mortality from recurrent PE than overt PE described in prior decades.

Key Words: clinical diagnosis • deep venous thrombosis • noninvasive tests • pulmonary embolism • thromboembolism

Submitted on May 16, 1994
Accepted on August 19, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Engelke, E. J. Rummeny, and K. Marten Pulmonary Embolism at Multi-Detector Row CT of Chest: One-year Survival of Treated and Untreated Patients Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 563 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Goodman Small Pulmonary Emboli: What Do We Know? Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 654 - 658. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Eyer, L. R. Goodman, and L. Washington Clinicians' Response to Radiologists' Reports of Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism or Inconclusive Interpretation of Pulmonary Embolism Using MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 623 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kearon Natural History of Venous Thromboembolism Circulation, June 17, 2003; 107(90231): I-22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bourriot, T. Couffinhal, V. Bernard, M. Montaudon, J. Bonnet, and F. Laurent Clinical Outcome After a Negative Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiographic Finding in an Inpatient Population From Cardiology and Pneumology Wards Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Smith Pulmonary Embolism: What's Wrong with This Diagnosis? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1489 - 1497. [Full Text]

				L. R. Goodman, R. J. Lipchik, R. S. Kuzo, Y. Liu, T. L. McAuliffe, and D. J. O'Brien Subsequent Pulmonary Embolism: Risk after a Negative Helical CT Pulmonary Angiogram- Prospective Comparison with Scintigraphy Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 535 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. G. Rajendran and A. F. Jacobson Review of 6-Month Mortality Following Low-Probability Lung Scans Arch Intern Med, February 22, 1999; 159(4): 349 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Greenfield and M. C. Proctor Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Embolism Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1996; 61(3): 1037 - 1037. [Full Text]