Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marik, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marik, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
(Chest. 1995;108:203-207.)
© 1995 American College of Chest Physicians

A Comparison of Bronchoscopic vs Blind Protected Specimen Brush Sampling in Patients With Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Paul E. Marik MD1 and William J. Brown PhD1

1 From the Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Detroit Medical Center and Wayne State University School or Medicine, Detroit

Background: Pneumonia is a common complication in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and increases ICU mortality. The clinical diagnosis of ventilator-associated, however, pneumonia is unreliable, and many consider bronchoscopic-directed protected specimen brush sampling and quantitative culture the diagnostic method of choice. Bronchoscopy, however, is expensive and not readily available in many ICUs.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that "blind" protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling may produce results similar to that of bronchoscopic-directed sampling.

Setting: The medical ICU of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Intervention: Patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) who had not received antibiotics for at least 48 h underwent "blind" and bronchoscopic-directed PSB sampling with quantitative culture.

Results: Fifty-five paired PSB specimens were obtained from 53 patients. There was an 85% quantitative agreement between the blind and bronchoscopic-directed specimens. The agreement was independent of the bronchopulmonary segment from which the bronchoscopic sampling was directed.

Conclusion: The results of this study are consistent with the notion that blind PSB sampling and quantitative culture may prove to be a useful, cost-effective, and minimally invasive method of diagnosing VAP.

Key Words: blind protected specimen brush • bronchoscopy • ventilator-associated pneumonia

Submitted on October 25, 1994
Accepted on December 8, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. M. Koenig and J. D. Truwit
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 637 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
S. Fujitani and V. L. Yu
Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Focus on Nonbronchoscopic Techniques (Nonbronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Including Mini-BAL, Blinded Protected Specimen Brush, and Blinded Bronchial Sampling) and Endotracheal Aspirates.
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 17 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. Chastre and J.-Y. Fagon
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 867 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J Dakin and M Griffiths
The pulmonary physician in critical care 1: Pulmonary investigations for acute respiratory failure
Thorax, January 1, 2002; 57(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. E. Marik and J. Varon
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia : Science and Hocus-Pocus
Chest, September 1, 2001; 120(3): 702 - 704.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. E. Marik
Aspiration Pneumonitis and Aspiration Pneumonia
N. Engl. J. Med., March 1, 2001; 344(9): 665 - 671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. S. Morehead and S. J. Pinto
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Arch Intern Med, July 10, 2000; 160(13): 1926 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. S. Niederman
Bronchoscopy in Nonresolving Nosocomial Pneumonia
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4_suppl_2): 212S - 218S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. E. Marik
Fever in the ICU
Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 855 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Casetta, F. Blot, S. Antoun, B. Leclercq, C. Tancrede, F. Doyon, and G. Nitenberg
Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Comparison of the Plugged Telescoping Catheter With the Protected Specimen Brush
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1641 - 1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. E. Marik and P. Careau
The Role of Anaerobes in Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia and Aspiration Pneumonia: A Prospective Study
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Chest Physicians.