Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Campagna, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Campagna, A. C.
(Chest. 1995;108:982-986.)
© 1995 American College of Chest Physicians

A Modified Abrams Needle Biopsy Technique

Carl M. Kirsch MD, FCCP1; D. Mark Kroe MD1; William A. Jensen MD, FCCP1; Frank T. Kagawa MD, FCCP1; John H. Wehner MD1; and Anthony C. Campagna MD, FCCP1

1 From the Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, Calif.

Study objective: To compare the diagnostic sensitivity of a modified Abrams needle pleural biopsy technique (A1) with the standard Abrams (A2) and Cope needle biopsy methods. The modified Abrams pleural biopsy technique consisted of suctioning each tissue sample into a syringe without removing the needle completely from the chest until the completion of the entire procedure. Both the standard Abrams and Cope needle techniques required needle removal from the chest after each pleural biopsy.

Design: Retrospective chart analysis.

Setting: Community teaching hospital affiliated with Stanford University.

Patients: Forty-seven patients (30 men and 17 women) with a mean age of 44.5 years (range, 19 to 81 years) who were referred to a pulmonary consultation service for pleural biopsy.

Interventions: Two of us (C.M.K. and F.T.K.) used the modified Abrams technique and two of us (W.A.J. and A.C.C.) used the standard Abrams technique. The Cope needle was used as originally described.

Measurements: We recorded the type of pleural biopsy needle and technique used in each patient. Biopsy specimen diameter and number of tissue samples obtained, final diagnoses, and complications were recorded.

Results: The diagnostic sensitivity for tuberculous pleurisy was 82% for the modified Abrams method, 71% for the standard Abrams method, and 88% for the standard Cope technique (pge0.3). There was no difference in size of tissue sample obtained (A1 vs A2), number of biopsies, or complications among the three methods of pleural biopsy.

Conclusions: The modified method of Abrams needle biopsy demonstrates a diagnostic sensitivity for pleural tuberculosis (82%) that is equivalent to that for the standard Abrams or Cope methods.

Key Words: Abrams needle • pleural biopsy • pleural TB

Submitted on April 7, 1995
Accepted on April 12, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
G. J Peek, S. Morcos, and G. Cooper
Regular review: The pleural cavity
BMJ, May 13, 2000; 320(7245): 1318 - 1321.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Chest Physicians.