Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindén, C.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindén, C.-J.
(Chest. 1996;109:109-114.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Aspects of Histopathologic Subtype as a Prognostic Factor in 85 Pleural Mesotheliomas

Leif Johansson MD1 and Carl-Johan Lindén MD2

1 From the Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
2 From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Background: The prognosis of patients with pleural mesothelioma is more dependent on "pretreatment factors" than on the effect of therapeutic interventions. Histopathologic subtype is one of several important prognostic factors in pleural mesothelioma, and several studies indicate that the epithelial subtype of pleural mesotheliomas has a more favorable prognosis than the sarcomatoid. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated qualitative and quantitative aspects of the tissue specimens used for histopathologic diagnosis in 85 patients with pleural mesothelioma.

Materials and methods: The prognostic roles of two different histopathologic classification systems were evaluated in 85 consecutive cases of pleural mesotheliomas. Efficiency of different diagnostic procedures, influence of the size of the biopsy specimens on the histopathologic diagnosis, and immunohistochemical profiles for histopathologic subtypes of mesotheliomas were also evaluated.

Results: Patients with pure epithelial mesotheliomas (n=35), and especially those with the tubulopapillary subtype (n=18) of epithelial mesotheliomas, survived significantly longer than those with a sarcomatoid component (n=50). With larger biopsy specimens (surgical biopsy, autopsy), more tumors were classified as biphasic (36/78 vs 9/44, p<0.005). The sarcomatoid mesotheliomas comprised about 20% of the tumors regardless of type of biopsy. Staining intensity for cytokeratin CAM 5.2 was equal in all types of mesotheliomas, while intensity with cytokeratin AE1/AE3 decreased from the epithelial to the sarcomatoid mesotheliomas. Staining with vimentin was most intense among the sarcomatoid mesotheliomas, while with epithelial membrane antigen it was most intense among the epithelial mesotheliomas.

Conclusions: The quality of the biopsy specimens has considerable impact on the possibility to arrive at a correct histopathologic diagnosis. Based on our results, we suggest tubulopapillary mesotheliomas be regarded as "low-grade mesotheliomas" and other types, including the epithelioid type of epithelial mesotheliomas, as "high-grade mesotheliomas." This should be taken into account when designing clinical trials.

Key Words: histopathology • immunohistochemistry • pleural mesothelioma • prognosis

Submitted on December 20, 1994
Accepted on June 22, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Xia, S. R. Kumar, R. Masood, M. Koss, C. Templeman, D. Quinn, S. Zhu, R. Reddy, V. Krasnoperov, and P. S. Gill
Up-Regulation of EphB4 in Mesothelioma and Its Biological Significance
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 11(12): 4305 - 4315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A Baldi, D Santini, F Vasaturo, M Santini, G Vicidomini, M P. Di Marino, V Esposito, A M Groeger, G Liuzzi, B Vincenzi, et al.
Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27 in human pleural malignant mesothelioma
Thorax, May 1, 2004; 59(5): 428 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
P. G. Phillips, G. Asimakopoulos, and M. O. Maiwand
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcome of limited surgical management
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
V.B. Antony, R. Loddenkemper, P. Astoul, C. Boutin, P. Goldstraw, J. Hott, F. Rodriguez Panadero, and S.A. Sahn
Management of malignant pleural effusions
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2001; 18(2): 402 - 419.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2000; 162(5): 1987 - 2001.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. B. Campbell
Malignant Mesothelioma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1503 - 1505.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.