Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannes, G. P.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannes, G. P.M.
(Chest. 1996;109:408-413.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Three Hundred Patients Referred for Lung Transplantation

Experiences of the Dutch Lung Transplantation Program

Gregory P.M. Mannes MD1; Willem J. de Boer MD2; Wim. van der Bij MD, PhD1; Rene G. Grevink MD1; Gerard H. Koëter MD, PhD1; and ;Groningen Lung Transplantation Group

1 From the Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
2 From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands

In November 1990, a lung transplantation program began at the University Hospital in Groningen, the Netherlands. As of April 1994, 300 patients were referred for lung transplantation and we investigated the decisions that have been made concerning these referrals up to January 1, 1995. The patients were evaluated according to a stepwise procedure. In stage 1, written information about the referred patients was discussed during the weekly, multidisciplinary lung transplantation meeting. In this stage, 14% of the patients were rejected and 2% were postponed. If no major objections for transplantation were identified, the patient was invited for a visit to the outpatient clinic, stage 2. The newly acquired information from that visit was discussed again at the transplantation meeting. In this stage, 11% of the patients were rejected and 18% postponed. The remaining patients underwent an (partial or complete) inpatient evaluation, stage 3. From all patients about whom a decision was made in this stage, only 5% were rejected, respectively 35% after partial evaluation and only 1.5% after complete evaluation. A total of 110 patients (37% of all referred patients) were listed for lung transplantation, stage 4. Of the listed patients, 20% died while awaiting an appropriate donor. The group of patients with COPD/emphysema had by far the lowest death rate on the waiting list. Patients with short stature (le1.65 m) had a much higher risk to die on the waiting list compared with patients with longer stature, 42% vs 13%. As of January 1, 1995, 55 patients have undergone transplantation, which is 50% of all patients on the waiting list and 18% of all referred patients. The stepwise selection procedure identifies patients with potential contraindications at an early stage. In this way, unrealistic expectations and unnecessary examinations, expense, and/or hospital admissions may be prevented. Donor shortage, and thus waiting list problems, still remains a significant drawback in the further development of lung transplantation.

Key Words: cystic fibrosis • emphysema • lung transplantation • mortality • pulmonary fibrosis • pulmonary hypertension • recipient selection • referrals • waiting list

Submitted on March 15, 1995
Accepted on September 1, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
I. Ben-Dor, D. Shitrit, M. R. Kramer, Z. Iakobishvili, G. Sahar, and D. Hasdai
Is Routine Coronary Angiography and Revascularization Indicated Among Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lung Transplantation?
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2557 - 2562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A.R. Glanville and M. Estenne
Indications, patient selection and timing of referral for lung transplantation
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2003; 22(5): 845 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. C. Anyanwu, A. McGuire, C. A. Rogers, and A. J. Murday
An economic evaluation of lung transplantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 411 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. D. VIZZA, R. D. YUSEN, J. P. LYNCH, F. FEDELE, G. ALEXANDER PATTERSON, and E. P. TRULOCK
Outcome of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Awaiting Lung Transplantation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2000; 162(3): 819 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. V. M. MOLLER, W. TIMENS, W. van der  BIJ, K. KOOI, B. de WEVER, J. DANKERT, and L. van ALPHEN
Haemophilus Influenzae in Lung Explants of Patients with End-stage Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 1998; 157(3): 950 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.