Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, S. L.
(Chest. 1996;109:475-479.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Effect of Altitude on Hand-held Peak Flowmeters

Robert L. Jensen PhD1; Robert O. Crapo MD1; and Steven L. Berlin RFPT1

1 From the Departments of Medicine, University of Utah and LDS Hospital and LDS Hospital Pulmonary Laboratory, Salt Lake City

Objective: To quantify the effect of altitude on the operational characteristics of hand-held peak flowmeters.

Design: Altitude simulation within a hypobaric chamber combined with five constant simulated peak flows delivered from a computerized pump were used to test commercially available peak flowmeters.

Setting: F.G. Hall Hyperbaric/Hypobaric facilities located at Duke University School of Medicine.

Measurements: Two each of nine models of commercially available hand-held peak flowmeters and a volume spirometer were tested at six simulated altitudes (100, 500, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000, and 3,000 m) using five target peak flows. Each peak flow was injected into each meter twice. Forward stepwise regression was used to check for nonlinear relationships between altitude and peak expiratory flowmeter readings. Linear regression equations were fit to the data at each target flow across altitude. Effect of absolute peak flow was tested by analysis of covariance.

Results: For these altitudes, linear relationships were found between altitude and measured peak flow. For all meters tested, the average decrease in peak flow ranged from minus8.7% at the lowest target flow (123 L/min) to minus6.5% at the highest target flow (702 L/min) for each 100 mm Hg decrease in barometric pressure (PB). Individual meters ranged from minus12.3% at the lowest target flow to minus4.4% at the highest target flow for 100 mm Hg decrease in PB. The spirometer had no significant changes associated with changes in PB. In all cases, the magnitude of the altitude effect, measured by percent change, decreased with increasing peak flow.

Conclusions: Peak expiratory flowmeters underread PEF as a function of both increasing altitude and increasing target peak flow.

Submitted on February 1, 1994
Accepted on August 30, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. G. IRVIN, R. J. MARTIN, V. M. CHINCHILLI, S. J. KUNSELMAN, and R. M. CHERNIACK
Quality Control of Peak Flow Meters for Multicenter Clinical Trials
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 396 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.