Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
(Chest. 1996;109:494-503.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Volume Expansion Increases Righ Ventricular Infarct Size in Dogs by Reducing Collateral Perfusion

William E. Johnston MD, FCCP1; Cheng Y. Lin PhD1; Alan E. Feerick FFARCSI1; Beverly Spray PhD2; and Jakob Vinten-Johansen PhD3

1 From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
2 From the Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.
3 From the Section on Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.

Study objective: Plasma volume expansion is frequently recommended to correct the low output state resulting from right ventricular (RV) infarction. However, any subsequent increase in pericardial and RV filling pressures from volume expansion could impair RV collateral blood flow. We examined whether volume expansion in dogs before right coronary ligation reduced collateral perfusion and worsened the extent of RV necrosis.

Design: Randomized experimental study.

Setting: Animal research laboratory in university medical center.

Participants: Forty anesthetized, closed-chest dogs were randomly assigned to normovolemic, pericardium opened (n=10) or intact (n=10) groups, and hypervolemic, pericardium opened (n=10) or intact (n=10) groups.

Interventions: Hypervolemic animals received 24 mL/kg of 6% hetastarch. All animals underwent 90 min right coronary ligation, followed by 120 min reperfusion. Collateral coronary blood flow (radioactive microspheres) and area of necrosis (An) were determined in the area at risk (Ar).

Measurements and results: Stroke volume decreased in all groups with ischemia but remained 25 to 40% greater in both hypervolemic groups than in normovolemic animals (p<0.05). In hypervolemic animals with intact pericardium, RV end-diastolic pressure increased to 10.4±2.1 mm Hg (mean±SD), a value that significantly exceeded those of the other three groups. During RV ischemia, collateral perfusion in the Ar was similar in both normovolemic groups and in hypervolemic animals with opened pericardium (mean range, 12.9±8.8 to 13.8±7.6 mL/min/100 g; p=NS), and the An/Ar varied from 11.8±6.3 to 18.6±17.4% (p=NS). In contrast, in hypervolemic animals with intact pericardium, collateral perfusion decreased to 7.2±3.5 mL/min/100 g and the An/Ar was increased to 38.2±18.6% (p<0.05 compared with other groups, respectively). Overall, An/Ar was inversely related to collateral blood flow in the Ar (r=minus0.46; p<0.05) and correlated positively with RV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.61; p<0.05).

Conclusions: Volume expansion preserved stroke volume during RV ischemia, independent of pericardial integrity. However, volume expansion in animals with an intact pericardium increased RV infarct size by twofold to threefold secondary to reduced periischemic collateral perfusion. This detrimental effect of volume expansion on infarct size was prevented by opening the pericardium.

Key Words: collateral perfusion • myocardial blood flow • pericardial pressure • right ventricular ischemia

Submitted on March 15, 1995
Accepted on August 2, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. E. Johnston
PRO: Fluid Restriction in Cardiac Patients for Noncardiac Surgery is Beneficial
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 340 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.