Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gornick, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gornick, C. C.
(Chest. 1996;109:773-779.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Cardiopulmonary Support Mitigates the Effects of Experimental Myocardial Ischemia

Herbert B. Ward MD, PhD1; Edward O. McFalls MD, PhD2; Douglas Baldwin MD1; Timothy G Nemzek MS1; and Charles C. Gornick MD2

1 From the Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis
2 From the Department of Sections of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis

The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary support (CPS) as a rescue method following failed angioplasty is unknown. The proximal left anterior descending (LAD) was occluded for 20 min in 21 dogs. Group 1 animals (n=15) were given CPS and group 2 animals (n=6) served as controls. During coronary occlusion, animals receiving CPS had increased mean arterial pressure (71±12 vs 58±7mmHg), decreased left atrial pressure (3±3 vs 12±3 mm Hg), increased ischemic area blood flow (0.20±0.16 vs 0.02±0.04 mL/min/g) and myocardial oxygen consumption (0.014±0.008 vs 0.003±0.006 mL O2/min/g), decreased remote area myocardial oxygen consumption (0.026±0.010 vs 0.091±0.047 mL O2/min/g), and an improved myocardial oxygen consumption index (0.60±0.33 vs 0.02±0.03) when compared with controls (p<0.05). During reperfusion (no CPS), group 1 animals had increased cardiac index (210±95 vs 117±46 mL/min/kg), renal blood flow (110±38% vs 53±45%), ischemic area blood flow (1.13±0.40 vs 0.58±0.27), and myocardial oxygen consumption(0.066±0.015 vs 0.032±0.018) when compared with controls (p<0.05). CPS improves oxidative metabolism in selective myocardial segments during coronary occlusion, promotes recovery of the postischemic myocardium, and results in improved peripheral circulation.

Key Words: cardiopulmonary support • myocardial ischemia • percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Submitted on May 16, 1995
Accepted on September 13, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.