Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Koerner, S. K.
(Chest. 1996;109:870-873.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Delayed Development of Obliterative Bronchiolitis Syndrome With OKT3 After Unilateral Lung Transplantation

A Plea for Multicenter Immunosuppressive Trials

David J. Ross MD, FCCP1; Stanley C. Jordan MD1; Steven D. Nathan MBBCh, FCCP1; Robert Mace Kass MD, FCCP1; and Spencer K. Koerner MD, FCCP1

1 From the Divisions of Pulmonary Medicine, Cardiothoracic Surgery, and Pediatric Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Lung Transplant Program, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles

There is no consensus regarding the optimal induction immunosuppression regimen after lung transplantation (LT). In addition to the potential benefit of a reduced incidence of early acute allograft rejection, cytolytic induction immunosuppression may impact on long-term allograft function. We retrospectively assessed our incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis syndrome (OBS) stages Ia and IIa in LT survivors given two different cytolytic induction immunosuppression regimens: (between March 1989 and October 1990) OKT3 (5 mg/d)x10 to 14 days (n=11) vs (between November 1990 and April 1993) Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin (MALG) (10 to 15 mg/kg/dx5 to 7 days. Cyclosporine (CSA) (whole blood polyclonal assay=600 to 800 ng/mL), azathioprine (1 to 2 mg/kg/d), and maintenance prednisone (0.2 mg/kg/d) were similar. Surveillance spirometry was performed monthly, in accordance with accepted American Thoracic Society criteria. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) were performed for clinical indications. Surveillance TBBs were not performed during the era of this study. As defined by the ISHLT "Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature and for Clinical Staging of Chronic Dysfunction in Lung Allografts," latencies to development of OBS stages Ia and IIa were determined by Kaplan-Meir analysis. Stepwise regression (Cox proportional hazards model) was performed for the variables: cytolytic induction regimen, episodes cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis, episodes CMV infection, serologic CMV donor (+): recipient (minus) mismatch, prior pregnancy, HLA (A,B,DR±DQ) mismatches, episodes greater than grade A1 acute cellular rejection (ACR). We found that the OKT3 cohort experienced longer latencies for OBS stages Ia and IIa. Latencies to OBS stage Ia for OKT3 vs MALG were 962±65 vs 354±85 days (X±SEM) respectively. Brookmeyer-Crowley 95% confidence intervals for median latencies were 744 to 1,180 vs 266 to 510 days for OKT3 vs MALG, respectively. The Cox model was significant only for the variable of the induction cytolytic immunosuppression regimen (p=0.0015). By physiologic criteria, a longer course of OKT3 appeared superior to the short-course MALG protocol in delaying chronic lung allograft dysfunction. These effects may be related either to inherent differences in the antilymphocyte preparations or, alternatively, the difference in duration of treatment between groups. Surveillance TBB and treatment of detected occult ACR may serve to negate the observed differences in latencies for OBS.

Key Words: chronic allograft rejection • immunosuppression • obliterative bronchiolitis

Submitted on May 30, 1995
Accepted on August 22, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
E. I. Majeski, M. K. Paintlia, A. D. Lopez, R. A. Harley, S. D. London, and L. London
Respiratory Reovirus 1/L Induction of Intraluminal Fibrosis, a Model of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia, Is Dependent on T Lymphocytes
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 163(4): 1467 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
E. I. Majeski, R. A. Harley, S. C. Bellum, S. D. London, and L. London
Differential Role for T Cells in the Development of Fibrotic Lesions Associated with Reovirus 1/L-Induced Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia versus Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2003; 28(2): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
B. P. Griffith and R. S. Poston
Immunobiology of Heart and Heart-Lung Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1403 - 1426.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. M. Fiser, C. G. Tribble, S. M. Long, A. K. Kaza, J. A. Kern, D. R. Jones, M. K. Robbins, and I. L. Kron
Ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation increases risk of late bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1041 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. I. Whyte, S. J. Rossi, M. S. Mulligan, R. Florn, L. Baker, S. Gupta, F. J. Martinez, and J. P. Lynch III
Mycophenolate Mofetil for Obliterative Bronchiolitis Syndrome After Lung Transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1997; 64(4): 945 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.