Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikonen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sovijärvi, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikonen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sovijärvi, A. R.
(Chest. 1996;109:879-884.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Selective Assessment of Single-Lung Graft Function With 133Xe Radiospirometry in Acute Rejection and Infection

Tuija Ikonen MD1; Ari L.J. Harjula MD1; Vuokko Kinnula MD2; Jukka Savola MD1; and Anssi R. Sovijärvi MD2

1 From the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
2 From the Department of Internal Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

In single-lung transplant recipients, the usefulness of spirometric indexes in detecting acute events involving the lung graft is limited due to the bias caused by the native lung. Selective functional monitoring is needed for the proper evaluation of complications after transplantation, but thus far, to our knowledge, no clinically feasible methods for selective graft-function assessment have been presented. In ten single-lung recipients, of whom six had a parenchymal lung disease and four had pulmonary hypertension, the relative ventilation (Vtx), perfusion (Qtx), and ventilation/perfusion ratio of the transplanted lung (V/Qtx) were determined with multidetector 133Xe radiospirometry. Additionally, the fractions of FEV1, FVC, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (Dco) of the transplant (FEV1tx, FVCtx, Dcotx, respectively) were determined by using corresponding radiospirometric parameters for the calculation of their distribution between the lungs. The analysis included seven episodes of acute rejection and nine episodes of infection. The Qtx decreased during acute rejection but did not change during infection (p=0.001). Compared with the figures during infection, the V/Qtx increased during acute rejection significantly (p<0.05) in patients with underlying fibrosis or emphysema, but not in those with pulmonary hypertension. In detection of acute events, the sensitivity of the selective parameters, ie, FEV1tx (86%) and FVCtx (73%), was higher than that of the sum-function parameters, FEV1 (66%) and FVC (40%). Moreover, the sensitivity of Dcotx (80%) was higher than that of Dco (60%) in detecting acute rejection. The findings indicate that, in single-lung recipients with a parenchymal lung disease, the assessment of Qtx, V/Qtx, and Dcotx with a radioactive tracer can help to distinguish acute rejection from infection. The graft-selective parameters, ie, FEV1tx, FVCtx, and Dcotx, tended to be more sensitive than the corresponding sum-function parameters in detecting acute events, thus providing a more accurate functional profile of the single-lung graft.

Key Words: acute allograft rejection • diffusing capacity of the lung • lung function tests • lung transplantation • radiospirometry • spirometry

Submitted on March 1, 1995
Accepted on November 27, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Kanno, P. C. Lee, S. J. Dodd, M. Williams, B. P. Griffith, and C. Ho
A novel approach with magnetic resonance imaging used for the detection of lung allograft rejection
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2000; 120(5): 923 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.