Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, R. M., III
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, M. B.
(Chest. 1996;109:1204-1209.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Quantitative Cultures to Semiquantitative Loop Cultures of Bronchoscopic Protected Specimen Brush Samples

Robert M. Middleton III MD1; William Huff 1; David A. Brickey DO1; and Michael B. Kirkpatrick MD1

1 From the Keesler Medical Center, Keesler Air Force Base, Biloxi, Miss, and University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile

Study objective: To compare quantitative growth from a calibrated loop to growth from the standard serial dilution technique of culturing bronchoscopic protected specimen brush (PSB) samples and to determine the effect of refrigeration of the PSB sample on subsequent quantitative growth.

Design: Laboratory stock cultures were sampled with a PSB and cultured by both standard 100-fold serial dilution as well as 1:100 mL and 1:1,000 mL calibrated loops. Stock cultures were also sampled with a PSB and growth before and after refrigeration for 24 h at 4°C (both serial dilution and calibrated loops) was compared. Clinical PSB samples from seven patients suspected of having lower respiratory tract infections were cultured by both techniques as well.

Setting: Clinical research laboratory and teaching hospital.

Patients and interventions: PSB samples from inpatients and outpatients who had clinically indicated bronchoscopy. No interventions.

Measurements and results: Quantitative growth from the 1:1,000 mL calibrated loop was within 1 log10 of growth from the serial dilution technique for 20 of 21 organisms, including 2 yeasts. Except for Haemophilus influenzae (known to be cold intolerant), there were no important differences in growth of bacteria before and after 24 h at 4°C. For quantitative bacterial growth, there was a significant correlation between serial dilution and the 1:1,000 mL loop cultures (R=0.86, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: In this study, quantitative growth from a single 1:1,000 mL loop culture of PSB samples was comparable to growth from the standard serial dilution technique. Our results also suggest that overnight refrigeration of PSB samples may be possible in certain clinical situations.

Key Words: bronchoscopy • culture • infection • microbiology • pneumonia • protected specimen brush

Submitted on May 12, 1995
Accepted on January 18, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. Afessa, R. D. Hubmayr, E. A. Vetter, M. T. Keegan, K. L. Swanson, L. M. Baddour, F. R. Cockerill III, and S. G. Peters
Bronchoscopy in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: Agreement of Calibrated Loop and Serial Dilution
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2006; 173(11): 1229 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. A. Jacobs, E. I. G. B. De Brauwer, E. I. M. Cornelissen, and M. Drent
Accuracy and Precision of Quantitative Calibrated Loops in Transfer of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2000; 38(6): 2117 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.