Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russi, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Speich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Russi, E. W.
(Chest. 1996;109:1423-1429.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Prospective Evaluation of a Semiquantitative Dip Slide Method Compared With Quantitative Bacterial Cultures of BAL Fluid

Rudolf Speich MD, FCCP1; Jürg Wüst PhD1; Thomas Hess MD1; Fritz H. Kayser MD1; and Erich W. Russi MD, FCCP1

1 From the Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Background: Quantitative bacteriologic workup of BAL fluid (BALF) has evolved as a sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. Conventional quantitative cultures are expensive, time-consuming, and often unavailable on a 24-h basis. Therefore, we evaluated a dip slide method for the semiquantitative measurement of bacterial cultures in BALF specimens and compared the results with those from conventional quantitative cultures.

Methods: Fifty BALF specimens from 45 patients with suspected pulmonary infection were examined prospectively with both methods. We compared the microbiologic results of conventional quantitative cultures with those of the dip slide method that is commercially available for blood cultures. Cost-effectiveness analysis of both methods was performed.

Results: In 37 BALF specimens, 64 bacterial strains were detected with both techniques. The dip slide method and conventional cultures showed a high correlation with respect to the colony counts of the individual organisms per milliliter BALF (r=0.935; p= 0.0001) and the sum of colony counts in individual patients (r=0.947; p=0.0001). Although five strains were not detected by the dip slide technique, the diagnostic accuracy was not influenced. In 13 BALF samples, there was no growth of bacteria with both techniques. While the diagnostic yield of both methods was similar, the dip slide technique was 44 to 66% less expensive than conventional cultures.

Conclusions: The examination of BALF with a dip slide method is highly comparable to conventional quantitative culture techniques, less expensive, and can be used independently of a specialized microbiology laboratory on a 24-h basis.

Key Words: bacterial pneumonia • bronchoalveolar lavage • diagnosis

Submitted on August 31, 1993
Accepted on January 4, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
P. E. Marik
Fever in the ICU
Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 855 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.