Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimori, K.
Right arrow Articles by Arakawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujimori, K.
Right arrow Articles by Arakawa, M.
(Chest. 1996;109:1525-1531.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Ventilatory Response to Continuous Incremental Changes in Respiratory Resistance in Patients With Mild Asthma

Katsuya Fujimori MD1; Makoto Satoh MD1; and Masaaki Arakawa MD1

1 From the Department of Medicine (II), Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata 951, Japan

Background: Conflicting results from previous studies on the effect of bronchial challenge on ventilatory patterns in asthmatics may be due to airflow obstruction present before induction of bronchospasm onset, as well as the different degrees of bronchoconstriction induced.

Purpose and methods: We examined the ventilatory response to stepwise increments in respiratory resistance (Rrs) induced by continuous methacholine inhalation in eight patients with mild stable asthma without airway obstruction and eight normal subjects. Methacholine was inhaled continuously during tidal breathing until a nearly two-fold increase in Rrs was observed. Respiratory parameters, including tidal volume (VT), respiratory frequency (f), inspiratory ventilation (VI), mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI), and duty ratio (TI/TT), were measured simultaneously by respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP). Arterial oxygen saturation (Sa02) was examined by pulse oximetry. The end-tidal CO2 fraction (FETCO2) was measured with a rapid-response infrared analyzer at the mouthpiece.

Results: Rrs, SaO2, FETCO2, and respiratory parameters, measured after saline solution inhalation, were not different between the two groups. Inhaled methacholine first decreased and then increased VI in both groups. However, changes in VI occurred earlier and to a greater extent in asthmatics than in normal subjects. At 200% Rrs (percent control), %VI was greater in asthmatics than in normal subjects (p<0.005) because of significant differences in % VT and %VT/TI between the two groups.

Conclusion: For a given degree of bronchoconstriction, the ventilatory response was more rapid and greater in patients with mild stable asthma without airway obstruction than in normal subjects. The different response to bronchial challenge between the two groups may be due to different increases in drive due to irritant receptor stimulation.

Key Words: bronchial asthma • bronchoconstriction • control of breathing • vagal reflex • ventilatory response

Submitted on July 19, 1995
Accepted on January 4, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. Oostveen, D. MacLeod, H. Lorino, R. Farre, Z. Hantos, K. Desager, and F. Marchal
The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 1026 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.