Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayes, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Knaus, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jayes, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Knaus, W. A.
(Chest. 1996;110:1332-1339.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Variations in the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in ICUs

Findings From a National Study

Robert L. Jayes MD1; Jack E. Zimmerman MD1; Douglas P. Wagner PhD2; and William A. Knaus MD2

1 From the ICU Research Unit, Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine, The George Washington University
2 From the Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia

Study objectives: To describe the variation in frequency of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in 42 US ICUs and to examine the relationship between published guidelines and qualitative observations about terminal care in 9 ICUs.

Design: Prospective inception cohort.

Setting: Forty-two ICUs in 40 US hospitals with more than 200 beds: 26 randomly selected and 14 large tertiary-care volunteers.

Participants: A consecutive sample of 17,440 ICU admissions during 1988 to 1990.

Measurements and results: We used age, race, comorbid conditions, disease, functional status, and acute physiology score on ICU day 1 to predict the likelihood of a DNR order for each patient. A cross-validated model was then used to predict variations in the risk of an ICU DNR order from 0 to 45% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve= 0.9). The model was then used to compare aggregate observed with predicted frequency of ICU DNR orders. Finally, we compared observations of DNR practices by a team of clinical and organizational researchers at 9 of the 42 ICUs with published guidelines and risk-adjusted DNR frequency: 1,577 admissions (9%) had DNR orders written in the ICU (range, 1.5 to 22%). The ICU site was a significant (p<0.0001) predictor of variance in the patient level model. DNR orders were written significantly (p<0.05) less frequently than predicted in 5 and more frequently than predicted in 3 of 42 ICUs. Nonwhite patients had significantly (p=0.0001) fewer DNR orders after adjustment. The research team's implicit judgments following on-site analysis failed to distinguish ICUs with more or less DNR orders than predicted. Site-visited ICUs exhibited practices to emulate and practices to avoid.

Conclusions: The frequency of ICU DNR orders can be predicted based on individual risk factors for groups of ICU patients. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, there is significant variation in the frequency of DNR orders in a national sample of ICUs. These variations may be due to unmeasured differences in patient characteristics such as treatment preferences, religious affiliation, educational level, or physician practices. We found no relationship between risk-adjusted DNR order frequency and adherence to published guidelines.

Key Words: cardiac arrest • cardiopulmonary resuscitation • critical illness • do-not-resuscitate orders • intensive care units • outcome and process assessment • probability models

Submitted on November 21, 1995
Accepted on May 10, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
C. R. Levy, E. W. Ely, K. Payne, R. A. Engelberg, D. L. Patrick, and J. R. Curtis
Quality of Dying and Death in Two Medical ICUs: Perceptions of Family and Clinicians
Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1775 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Sinuff, D. J. Cook, G. M. Rocker, L. E. Griffith, S. D. Walter, M. M. Fisher, P. M. Dodek, P. Sjokvist, E. McDonald, J. C. Marshall, et al.
DNR directives are established early in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: [Les directives PDR sont etablies tot chez les patients sous ventilation mecanique a l'unite des soins intensifs]
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2004; 51(10): 1034 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. L. Campbell and J. A. Guzman
Impact of a Proactive Approach to Improve End-of-Life Care in a Medical ICU
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1): 266 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Junker, J. E. Zimmerman, C. Alzola, E. A. Draper, and D. P. Wagner
A Multicenter Description of Intermediate-Care Patients* : Comparison With ICU Low-Risk Monitor Patients
Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1253 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. J. Goodlin, Z. Zhong, J. Lynn, J. M. Teno, J. P. Fago, N. Desbiens, A. F. Connors Jr, N. S. Wenger, and R. S. Phillips
Factors Associated With Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults
JAMA, December 22, 1999; 282(24): 2333 - 2339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
DETERMINANTS OF DNR ORDERS AND LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS
Journal Watch (General), December 6, 1996; 1996(1206): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.