Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D.
(Chest. 1996;110:1437-1442.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Theophylline Improves Measurements of Respiratory Muscle Efficiency

Michael S. Sherman MD, FCCP1; David M. Lang MD2; Amir Matityahu BA2; and Dave Campbell BS, RPFT1

1 From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, MCP—Hahnemann School of Medicine, Allegheny University Hospitals-Hahnemann Division, Philadelphia
2 From the Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, MCP—Hahnemann School of Medicine, Allegheny University Hospitals-Hahnemann Division, Philadelphia

To determine the effect of theophylline on respiratory muscle efficiency (RME), 12 normal subjects were given theophylline vs placebo in a double-blind, randomized crossover protocol. Spirometry, resting energy expenditure, minute ventilation, RME, and oxygen cost of breathing were measured at baseline, after taking theophylline, and after placebo. RME was calculated by dividing the added work required to breathe through a threshold load by the added energy consumed during loaded breathing. Oxygen cost of breathing was calculated by dividing the increase in oxygen consumption induced by breathing an air/carbon dioxide mixture by the associated increase in minute ventilation. RME increased from 3.3±1.6% at baseline to 7.9±3.2% after theophylline (p<0.01) but did not change significantly after placebo (4.8±2.4%). Oxygen cost of breathing decreased from 3.9±2.4 mL O2 per liter at baseline to 1.7±0.7 mL O2 per liter after theophylline (p<0.05) but did not change significantly after placebo (2.8±1.3 mL O2 per liter). Theophylline use was also associated with an 18% increase in minute ventilation (p<0.01) and a 15.7% increase in resting energy expenditure (p<0.01). Theophylline improves measured RME and reduces oxygen cost of breathing in normal subjects. These effects are offset by increases in resting energy expenditure and minute ventilation.

Key Words: oxygen consumption • oxygen cost of breathing • respiratory muscles • resting energy expenditure • theophylline • work of breathing

Submitted on January 16, 1996
Accepted on July 24, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.