Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchis, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchis, J.
(Chest. 1996;110:1443-1445.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Pain During Arterial Puncture

Jordi Giner RN1; Pere Casan MD1; José Belda MD1; Mercedes González RN1; Rosa Ma Miralda RN1; and Joaquín Sanchis MD1

1 From the Unitat de Funció Pulmonar, Departament de Pneumologia, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Hospital de la Santa Creu i de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Study objective: To quantify the level of pain reported by patients during arterial puncture with or without local anesthesia, and to compare the results with levels reported for venous puncture.

Design: Double-blind study of puncture with and without local anesthesia.

Setting: Pulmonary function laboratory, department of pneumology.

Patients: We studied 270 consecutive patients undergoing arterial puncture divided into two groups. In group A (n=210), we assessed level of pain with and without local anesthesia and with placebo. In group B (n=60), we compared pain of arterial and venous puncture.

Interventions: The arterial puncture was performed in the radial artery; venous puncture was in the median basilic vein.

Measurements and results: The pain was quantified on a visual analog scale (10 cm). Mean level of pain for all arterial punctures without anesthesia or placebo was slight to moderate (3.01±1.94 cm). Subcutaneous anesthetic infiltration before arterial puncture significantly reduced pain by more than 50%, to 1.50±1.54 cm, a level that was significantly lower than the pain level reported after conventional venous puncture (1.80±1.10 cm). The pain reported by patients who received no anesthesia was not significantly different (p=0.45) from that perceived by those who received subcutaneous infiltration of saline solution (placebo).

Conclusions: Arterial puncture with prior infiltration of local anesthetic is the least painful procedure among those studied. Use of local anesthesia is indicated whenever conventional arterial puncture is required.

Key Words: arterial puncture • local anesthesia • pain

Submitted on April 9, 1996
Accepted on July 5, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
T. L. Hudson, S. F. Dukes, and K. Reilly
Use of Local Anesthesia for Arterial Punctures
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2006; 15(6): 595 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JRSMHome page
D. M Sado and C. D Deakin
Local anaesthesia for venous cannulation and arterial blood gas sampling: are doctors using it?
J R Soc Med, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 158 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
D. Bates and P. Cutting
Local anaesthetic and arterial puncture
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2001; 18(5): 378 - 378.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.