Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbaro, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barbaro, G.
(Chest. 1996;110:1507-1514.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Fluconazole vs Itraconazole-Flucytosine Association in the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis in AIDS Patients

A Double-blind, Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Study

Giuseppe Barbaro MD, FCCP1; Giorgio Barbarini MD2; Gabriella Di Lorenzo MD1; and ;Candida Esophagitis Muiticenter Italian Study (CEMIS) Group

1 From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
2 From the Department of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy

Study objective: To assess the role and the therapeutic efficacy of fluconazole and itraconazole-flucytosine association compared with placebo, in the treatment of endoscopically diagnosed esophageal candidiasis in a selected population of AIDS patients.

Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: University Hospitals and AIDS Centers.

Patients: Eighty-five HIV-positive patients (53 men and 32 women; mean age, 28 years) at first episode of esophageal candidiasis diagnosed by endoscopy (grades I to II of Kodsi's endoscopic classification and grades I to IIa of Barbarao's clnical classification). All the patients selected for the study provided informed consent.

Interventions: The patients have been double blindly randomized in 3 groups of patients in relation to pharmacologic therapy: (1) the patients of the first group (n=30) received fluconazole (3 mg/kg daily orally) and placebo (100 mg/kg/daily orally); (2) the patients of the second group (n=30) received itraconazole (3 mg/kg daily orally) and flucytosine (100 mg/kg daily orally); and (3) the patients of the third group (n=25) received placebo (3 mg/kg daily orally) and placebo (100 mg/kg daily orally). After 2 weeks of treatment, the patients previously randomized to receive placebo only were double blindly randomized to receive fluconazole+placebo or itraconazole+flucytosine. To evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic therapy, clinical and endoscopic examinations were performed at weeks 2 and 4 and at the end of follow-up (3 months).

Results: At week 2, endoscopic cure (grade 0) was observed in 68.9% of the fluconazole+placebo group and in 72.4% of the itraconazole+flucytosine group (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.33; p=0.772); partial endoscopic response (grade I) was observed in 22.7% of the placebo group. Chnical cure (grade 0) was observed in 75.8% of fluconazole+placebo group and in 72.4% of itraconazole+flucytosine group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.42; p=0.764), with a difference statistically significant for both treatments in comparison to placebo group (p<0.001). Partial chnical response (grade I) was observed in 27.3% of the placebo group. At the end of follow-up, endoscopic cure was observed in 89.8% of the fluconazole+placebo group and in 94.8% of the itraconazole+flucytosine group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.08; p=0.695). Clinical cure was observed in 94.8% of the fluconazole+placebo group and in 97.3% of the itraconazole+flucytosine group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.07; p=0.981).

Conclusions: The results of this study have demonstrated that both fluconazole and itraconazole+flucytosine association are efficacious in short-term treatment of esophageal candidiasis in AIDS patients with a statistically significant difference in comparison to placebo. Both therapeutic regimens demonstrated a good therapeutic efficacy, without statistically significant difference, between them, in the rate of endoscopic and clinical cure. Itraconazole+flucytosine association may represent an alternative therapeutic regimen for patients with fluconazole-resistant Candida esophagitis.

Key Words: AIDS • candidiasis • fluconazole • flucytosine • itraconazole

Submitted on February 5, 1996
Accepted on June 5, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Cuenca-Estrella
Combinations of antifungal agents in therapy-what value are they?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2004; 54(5): 854 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Vermes, H.-J. Guchelaar, and J. Dankert
Flucytosine: a review of its pharmacology, clinical indications, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and drug interactions
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2000; 46(2): 171 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. A. Gaissert, C. K. Breuer, A. Weissburg, and L. Mermel
Surgical management of necrotizing Candida esophagitis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 231 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.