Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trottier, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Veremakis, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trottier, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Veremakis, C.
(Chest. 1996;110:1547-1550.)
© 1996 American College of Chest Physicians

Validation of an Inexpensive B-Mode Ultrasound Device for Detection of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Steven J. Trottier MD1; Subhash Todi MD1; and Christopher Veremakis MD1

1 From the Department of Critical Care Medicine, St. John's Mercy Medical Center/St. Louis University, St. Louis

Objective: To validate a portable, inexpensive, real-time, B-mode ultrasound device compared with duplex ultrasound in the detection of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients clinically suspected of having deep vein thrombosis.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary care community teaching hospital.

Patients: Medical-surgical hospitalized patients undergoing duplex ultrasonography for clinically suspected lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Interventions: Hospitalized patients who underwent duplex ultrasound examinations were enrolled in the study. Blinded from the duplex ultrasound results, the investigators utilized the study ultrasound device to perform compression ultrasonography of the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal veins within 48 h of the duplex examinations. The results of the study ultrasound device were recorded as normal (compressible) or abnormal (noncompressible).

Results: Of the 198 lower limbs evaluated, duplex ultrasonography documented 34 proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombi. The study ultrasound device detected 32 of the 34 proximal thrombi detected by duplex ultrasonography. One false-positive result of an examination occurred with the study ultrasound device. Compared with duplex ultrasonography, the study ultrasound device had a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 97%, and negative predictive value of 98%.

Conclusions: The results of this investigation document that the study ultrasound device has an acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for clinical use in detection of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Further evaluation and validation of this ultrasound device are warranted.

Key Words: compression ultrasonography • cost containment • duplex ultrasonography • lower extremity • proximal deep vein thrombosis • venous thromboembolic disease • venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Submitted on May 24, 1996
Accepted on July 22, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
B. L Davidson and E. J Deppert
Ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: where to now?
BMJ, January 3, 1998; 316(7124): 2 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Chest Physicians.