Economic Analysis of Respiratory Rehabilitation

¹ From the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
² From the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
³ From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
⁴ From the Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Study objective: We report on the incremental costs associated with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQL) following 6 months of respiratory rehabilitation compared with conventional community care.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation.

Setting: A respiratory rehabilitation unit.

Participants: Eighty-four subjects who completed the rehabilitation trial.

Intervention: Two months of inpatient rehabilitation followed by 4 months of outpatient supervision.

Measurements and results: All costs (hospitalization, medical care, medications, home care, assistive devices, transportation) were included. Simultaneous allocation was used to determine capital and direct and indirect hospitalization costs. The incremental cost of achieving improvements beyond the minimal clinically important difference in dyspnea, emotional function, and mastery was $11,597 (Canadian). More than 90% of this cost was attributable to the inpatient phase of the program. Of the nonphysician health-care professionals, nursing was identified as the largest cost center, followed by physical therapy and occupational therapy. The number of subjects needed to be treated (NNT) to improve one subject was 4.1 for dyspnea, 4.4 for fatigue, 3.3 for emotion, and 2.5 for mastery.

Conclusion: Cost estimates of various approaches to rehabilitation should be combined with valid, reliable, and responsive measures of outcome to enable cost-effectiveness measures to be reported. Comparison studies with the same method are necessary to determine whether the improvements in HRQL that follow inpatient rehabilitation are cheap or expensive. Such information will be important in identifying the extent to which alternative approaches to rehabilitation can influence resource allocation. A consideration of cost-effectiveness from the perspective of NNT may be useful in the evaluation of health-care programs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. Ries, G. S. Bauldoff, B. W. Carlin, R. Casaburi, C. F. Emery, D. A. Mahler, B. Make, C. L. Rochester, R. ZuWallack, and C. Herrerias Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5_suppl): 4S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Troosters, R. Casaburi, R. Gosselink, and M. Decramer Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2005; 172(1): 19 - 38. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Decramer, R Gosselink, M Rutten-Van Molken, J Buffels, O Van Schayck, P-A Gevenois, R Pellegrino, E Derom, and W De Backer Assessment of progression of COPD: report of a workshop held in Leuven, 11-12 March 2004 Thorax, April 1, 2005; 60(4): 335 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E M Clini and M Romagnoli Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation: does it make sense? Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 43 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M Yohannes and M. J Connolly Pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in the UK: a national representative survey Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2004; 18(4): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. P. Hui and A. B. Hewitt A Simple Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Improves Health Outcomes and Reduces Hospital Utilization in Patients With COPD Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 94 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. VAN DEN BOOM, M. P. M. H. RUTTEN-VAN MOLKEN, J. MOLEMA, P. R. S. TIRIMANNA, C. VAN WEEL, and C. P. VAN SCHAYCK The Cost Effectiveness of Early Treatment with Fluticasone Propionate 250 {micro}g Twice a Day in Subjects with Obstructive Airway Disease . Results of the DIMCA Program Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2001; 164(11): 2057 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Clini, K. Foglio, L. Bianchi, R. Porta, M. Vitacca, and N. Ambrosino In-Hospital Short-term Training Program for Patients With Chronic Airway Obstruction Chest, November 1, 2001; 120(5): 1500 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T L Griffiths, C J Phillips, S Davies, M L Burr, and I A Campbell Cost effectiveness of an outpatient multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation programme Thorax, October 1, 2001; 56(10): 779 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Foglio, L. Bianchi, and N. Ambrosino Is It Really Useful To Repeat Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs in Patients With Chronic Airway Obstruction? : A 2-Year Controlled Study Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1696 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W Dalton and J. L Keating Number Needed to Treat: A Statistic Relevant for Physical Therapists Physical Therapy, December 1, 2000; 80(12): 1214 - 1219. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. E. Hernandez, T. M. Rubio, F. O. Ruiz, H. S. Riera, R. S. Gil, and J. C. Gomez Results of a Home-Based Training Program for Patients With COPD Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 106 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Duren-Winfield, M. J. Berry, S. A. Jones, D. H. Clark, and M. A. Sevick Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Methods for the REACT Study West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2000; 22(4): 460 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Guell, P. Casan, J. Belda, M. Sangenis, F. Morante, G. H. Guyatt, and J. Sanchis Long-term Effects of Outpatient Rehabilitation of COPD: A Randomized Trial Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4): 976 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Sullivan, S. D. Ramsey, and T. A. Lee The Economic Burden of COPD Chest, February 1, 2000; 117(2_suppl): 5S - 9S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]